GeekDrew
Diamond Member
- Jun 7, 2000
- 9,099
- 19
- 81
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: vegetation
They lose money on consumers who use regular stamps and mail them with hand printed addresses. Just the cost of printing stamps and distributing them is probably a fourth of the face value itself. And then handprinted envelopes have to be pecked in by a human, adding to labor costs. Metered mail (electronic stamps) has no such issues; no printing costs, no distribution, all addresses are typewritten so OCR readers can process quickly, etc.
wrong. mail is sorted by optical scanners. Some needs to be resorted by hand, but most does not.
Not necessarily. The majority of mail is sorted automatically, but there is a significant quantity that is not. I know that all of the carriers at a particular post office spend several hours a day doing nothing but hand-sorting mail, because DPS was unable to do so.
Even the poorest handwriting can usually be deciphered by computer
Your point? I don't care what they have the ability to do -- I've seen, and have heard, about what they actually do.
I don't know why your arguing with each other, you're both right. I'm sure there's a lot of mail that gets sorted by hand, but percentage-wise I bet it's a very small number. But even a fraction of a percent of 10s of millions of pieces a day, is a big number.
we're fighting because we're argumentative
also, rural locations don't have access to mail sorting equipment, so tha majority of it is done by hand. fun fun.
