#MAGAFLATION - $12.99 dozen eggs (Page 26)

Page 38 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
Have you considered shopping around for a new carrier?

When I moved to Maine from MA, my GEICO car premium fell by ~$250/year, but renter's jumped $100/year. Switched both to Progressive for literally half the cost of GEICO for equivalent coverage.

My dad has had Hartford for like 30 years now with his car and home combined for a discount.

When I look at others, they're usually at least 800 or more more expensive but I guess I could look around again.

Never had Geico.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,651
13,779
136
My dad has had Hartford for like 30 years now with his car and home combined for a discount.

When I look at others, they're usually at least 800 or more more expensive but I guess I could look around again.

Never had Geico.
Lots of companies out there. It's worth shopping around between the big names and more regional carriers.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,029
12,267
136
Just using Costco as a barometer, just about all of their high quality fresh not frozen packaged entrées (Suki Chicken Marsala as an example) jumped between a $1.50 and $2.00 from a week ago. This is just the biggening of a beautiful fascist state. Simple minds for simple solutions.
5 pound bag (with 5 1lb packets) of hamburger is now just a few cents under $30 or $6 a pound now.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: balloonshark

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,727
18,899
136
My Tru-Grill chicken breast strips have remained steady in price so far so that's nice.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
Where the fuck did you get that from? Maybe you should re-read what I said. But thank you for showing exactly why Insurance premiums are not a good indication of inflationary increases, or did you forget that inflation was going down in 2024? You just proved my point.

You're quoting fantasy numbers.

This is reality..

 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
You are in fact quoting fantasy numbers. BLS is (or at least was) the real source, not a CEO on TV talking his book.

I wouldn't believe anything associated the Trump administration says including the value of $1 will be $1 tomorrow.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,029
32,494
146
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,565
3,081
136
You're quoting fantasy numbers.

This is reality..

Once again you leave no doubt that you just randomly respond to people's posts, without comprehending anything that was said. Seriously, what fantasy numbers am I quoting? Who claimed that "the Bureau of LYING statistics" showed inflation to be 2.1%? Sure the fuck wasn't me. I just asked you where you where getting your 2.1% when "the Bureau of LYING statistics" shows it to be 2.7% and never claimed it to be 2.1%, and I supplied the source. The rest was trying to get you to realize that insurance premiums are a horrible indication of inflationary increases, as they increase substantially when inflation is going down as well.

I wouldn't believe anything associated the Trump administration says including the value of $1 will be $1 tomorrow.

You can't debate such a position if you are making false claims yourself, don't you think? If you can't begin with accurately presenting the numbers "the Bureau of LYING statistics" actually gave, then how can your position be taken seriously, true or not?
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
Once again you leave no doubt that you just randomly respond to people's posts, without comprehending anything that was said. Seriously, what fantasy numbers am I quoting? Who claimed that "the Bureau of LYING statistics" showed inflation to be 2.1%? Sure the fuck wasn't me. I just asked you where you where getting your 2.1% when "the Bureau of LYING statistics" shows it to be 2.7% and never claimed it to be 2.1%, and I supplied the source. The rest was trying to get you to realize that insurance premiums are a horrible indication of inflationary increases, as they increase substantially when inflation is going down as well.



You can't debate such a position if you are making false claims yourself, don't you think? If you can't begin with accurately presenting the numbers "the Bureau of LYING statistics" actually gave, then how can your position be taken seriously, true or not?

LOL and this is why you lose elections.

2.7 or 2700% voters don't GIVE A FUCK

We're living in a world where people believe more in crypto numbers than actual numbers.


And you're wasting your time arguing here when you should be cutting off their balls and then hanging them on display for the world to see for trying to pull the lies and corruption they are!
 

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,565
3,081
136
LOL and this is why you lose elections.

2.7 or 2700% voters don't GIVE A FUCK

We're living in a world where people believe more in crypto numbers than actual numbers.


And you're wasting your time arguing here when you should be cutting off their balls and then hanging them on display for the world to see for trying to pull the lies and corruption they are!
How about you put down the crack pipe, get help for your YouTube addiction, and address what is actualy being discussed, and stop responding with unrelated bullshit that has nothing to do with what was said. So either man up, admit you made up the claim that the "Bureau of LYING statistics" said that inflation was 2.1%, which I gave proof (not a YouTube video), was untrue. Or, you can stop responding all together, showing us all you had/have no intentions of being honest, as I was not talking about this administration's truthfulness. We are talking about YOU, and your dishonesty in your claim. Which is what you have been side stepping all along. Man the fuck up!
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Indus

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
How about you put down the crack pipe, get help for your YouTube addiction, and address what is actualy being discussed, and stop responding with unrelated bullshit that has nothing to do with what was said. So either man up, admit you made up the claim that the "Bureau of LYING statistics" said that inflation was 2.1%, which I gave proof (not a YouTube video), was untrue. Or, stop responding all together, showing us all you had/have no intentions of being honest, as we are not talking about this administration's truthfulness. We are talking about YOU, and your dishonesty in your claim. Which is what you have been side stepping all along. Man the fuck up!

Might as well change your name to MAGAMidnight.

Since you seem to love doing Trumps dirty work for him while refusing to blame him for the fantasy numbers of inflation at 2.7 or 2.1%
 

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,565
3,081
136
Might as well change your name to MAGAMidnight.

Since you seem to love doing Trumps dirty work for him while refusing to blame him for the fantasy numbers of inflation at 2.7 or 2.1%
So, rather than Maning up, you are going to continue to manipulate and be dishonest. There is absolutely no reason for me to change my name, as I am not MAGA, nor has anything I have said, have anything to do with MAGA. It does, however, have everything to do with YOUR dishonesty, and avoidance of that fact. Where is the disconnect you seem to be having about that? We are not talking about Trump, his adminstration, or if the numbers the "Bureau of LYING statistics" are factual or not. We are talking about your lie, claiming the "Bureau of LYING statistics" said that inflation was 2.1%, which is untrue. Whether the actual number they show, which is 2.7% inflation, is factual or not, and/or blaming Trump, is a completely different conversation. All you had to do is admit that you fucked up making the claim of 2.1%, but no, you are not man enough to do that.

You would rather devalue and undermine your own argument by being dishonest, ignore that you messed up, which makes it appear you are lying purposely. How can anyone take you seriously, and have an honest conversation about anything with you, if you can't be honest from the start, or at least man up and admit when you make a mistake. You can attack me for YOUR dishonesty, and/or try to make fun of me all you want, as it's nothing more than a reflection of yourself, and means nothing to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brycejones

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
So, rather than Maning up, you are going to continue to manipulate and be dishonest. There is absolutely no reason for me to change my name, as I am not MAGA, nor has anything I have said, have anything to do with MAGA. It does, however, have everything to do with YOUR dishonesty, and avoidance of that fact. Where is the disconnect you seem to be having about that? We are not talking about Trump, his adminstration, or if the numbers the "Bureau of LYING statistics" are factual or not. We are talking about your lie, claiming the "Bureau of LYING statistics" said that inflation was 2.1%, which is untrue. Whether the actual number they show, which is 2.7% inflation, is factual or not, and/or blaming Trump, is a completely different conversation. All you had to do is admit that you fucked up making the claim of 2.1%, but no, you are not man enough to do that.

You would rather devalue and undermine your own argument by being dishonest, ignore that you messed up, which makes it appear you are lying purposely. How can anyone take you seriously, and have an honest conversation about anything with you, if you can't be honest from the start, or at least man up and admit when you make a mistake. You can attack me for YOUR dishonesty, and/or try to make fun of me all you want, as it's nothing more than a reflection of yourself, and means nothing to me.


LOL you don't even realize.. I manned up.. I accepted reality that in this country people care about FEELING more than facts.

You can't even admit to more than half the country being immune to your so called facts!

Since 2.1% is not what people are seeing and FEELING..


Keep repeating your so called Trump's facts as armor.. you'll feel like this dude..

1757293259345.png
 

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,565
3,081
136
LOL you don't even realize.. I manned up.. I accepted reality that in this country people care about FEELING more than facts.

You can't even admit to more than half the country being immune to your so called facts!

Since 2.1% is not what people are seeing and FEELING..


Keep repeating your so called Trump's facts as armor.. you'll feel like this dude..

View attachment 129825
No, you are not manning up, you are avoiding admitting you fucking lied about inflation rate the "Bureau of LYING statistics" published. We are not discussin whether their 2.7% inflation rate, they published, is accurate, or not. We are discussing the fact that you can't even be honest about what "Bureau of LYING statistics" actually shows, while you are trying to claim it's not accurate, and that they are liars, all while you lied about what they do show. How the fuck can you try to argue something if you can't even be honest of what this adminstration is publishing? You keep avoiding that fact and trying to argue what inflation rate people are seeing, which doesn't fucking matter as that isn't the discussion we are having, but you keep wanting to deflect to. The issue is you can't even be honest about what the "Bureau of LYING statistics" shows, which means you can't even argue that Trump's numbers are true or false because you are lying yourself about what those numbers are.

Again, where the fuck is the disconnect you seem to have?

Since you are trying to manipulate and deflect, let me be direct; does the "Bureau of LYING statistics" show the inflation rate to be 2.1% as you claimed or implied it does? it's either yes or no (I already gave you the answer), and has nothing to do with "Trump's facts of armor" crap, as it's about what they do show, not if that number is accurate. So you can stop trying to act like I am argying that ifnlation is 2.1% or 2.7% which is not what I am argying or discussing with you. Which is why I haven't responded to your baiting to deflect away from you lying. Now man up, or shut up!
 
Last edited:

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
No, you are not manning up, you are avoiding admitting you fucking lied about inflation rate the "Bureau of LYING statistics" published. We are not discussin whether their 2.7% inflation rate, they published, is accurate, or not. We are discussing the fact that you can't even be honest about what "Bureau of LYING statistics" actually shows, while you are trying to claim it's not accurate, and that they are liars, all while you lied about what they do show. How the fuck can you try to argue something if you can't even be honest of what this adminstration is publishing? You keep avoiding that fact and trying to argue what inflation rate people are seeing, which doesn't fucking matter as that isn't the discussion we are having, but you keep wanting to deflect to. The issue is you can't even be honest about what the "Bureau of LYING statistics" shows, which means you can't even argue that Trump's numbers are true or false because you are lying yourself about what those numbers are.

Again, where the fuck is the disconnect you seem to have?

Since you are trying to manipulate and deflect, let me be direct; does the "Bureau of LYING statistics" show the inflation rate to be 2.1% as you claimed or implied it does? it's either yes or no (I already gave you the answer), and has nothing to do with "Trump's facts of armor" crap, as it's about what they do show, not if that number is accurate. So you can stop trying to act like I am argying that ifnlation is 2.1% or 2.7% which is not what I am argying or discussing with you. Which is why I haven't responded to your baiting to deflect away from you lying. Now man up, or shut up!

They are FULL OF LIES.

You can choose to believe them or not.. that's up to you. I don't!
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,727
18,899
136
So, rather than Maning up, you are going to continue to manipulate and be dishonest. There is absolutely no reason for me to change my name, as I am not MAGA, nor has anything I have said, have anything to do with MAGA. It does, however, have everything to do with YOUR dishonesty, and avoidance of that fact. Where is the disconnect you seem to be having about that? We are not talking about Trump, his adminstration, or if the numbers the "Bureau of LYING statistics" are factual or not. We are talking about your lie, claiming the "Bureau of LYING statistics" said that inflation was 2.1%, which is untrue. Whether the actual number they show, which is 2.7% inflation, is factual or not, and/or blaming Trump, is a completely different conversation. All you had to do is admit that you fucked up making the claim of 2.1%, but no, you are not man enough to do that.

You would rather devalue and undermine your own argument by being dishonest, ignore that you messed up, which makes it appear you are lying purposely. How can anyone take you seriously, and have an honest conversation about anything with you, if you can't be honest from the start, or at least man up and admit when you make a mistake. You can attack me for YOUR dishonesty, and/or try to make fun of me all you want, as it's nothing more than a reflection of yourself, and means nothing to me.
Anyone that disagrees with him is MAGA now, no matter how utterly stupid and wildly misplaced the accusation is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Indus

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
Anyone that disagrees with him is MAGA now, no matter how utterly stupid and wildly misplaced the accusation is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Or a terrorist lover like you.

I'm laughing and smiling as Israel is slaughtering them.

LONG MAY IT CONTINUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The bolded (by me) is simply not an acceptable statement here.
Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,565
3,081
136
They are FULL OF LIES.

You can choose to believe them or not.. that's up to you. I don't!
Whether their numbers are full of lies or not is not what we are talking about and you know it. You lying about those numbers is what we are talking about, and you keep avoiding. I have yet to say anything about the accuracy of their numbers, that is the baiting you keep trying to use to deflect away from your lie, because you are lying about what numbers they do show. Instead of admitting your "mistake" you keep trying to deflect to the point you are almost over the edge and into gaslighting territory. Because you keep trying to act like we are talking about their accuracy, when in fact we are talking about YOUR innaccuracy of what they actually show.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,972
11,115
136
Whether their numbers are full of lies or not is not what we are talking about and you know it. You lying about those numbers is what we are talking about, and you keep avoiding. I have yet to say anything about the accuracy of their numbers, that is the baiting you keep trying to use to deflect away from your lie, because you are lying about what numbers they do show. Instead of admitting your "mistake" you keep trying to deflect to the point you are almost over the edge and into gaslighting territory. Because you keep trying to act like we are talking about their accuracy, when in fact we are talking about YOUR innaccuracy of what they actually show.

Because unless the numbers come back to EXACTLY what they said THEY ARE LYING!

And they are.

If they're lying I'm not.

Q. E. D.