NikolaeVarius
Lifer
- Oct 25, 2006
- 11,036
- 11
- 91
I wonder. Why Machine guns? Thats a pretty dangerous weapon to let people have.
I always thought that the 2nd amendment was outdated. In those days, it didn't really matter if the people could carry guns. Even military trained personnel could only get off 3 shots a minute those days. So if a guy tried to kill people, he would basically get one shot.
But now, we're talking about civilians having machines guns that can spew out hundreds of round a minute. Assault Rifles, and such that the founding fathers could never have dreamed of. I really question if they would have put in that clause know if they knew how far weapons technology would go.
I always thought that the 2nd amendment was outdated. In those days, it didn't really matter if the people could carry guns. Even military trained personnel could only get off 3 shots a minute those days. So if a guy tried to kill people, he would basically get one shot.
But now, we're talking about civilians having machines guns that can spew out hundreds of round a minute. Assault Rifles, and such that the founding fathers could never have dreamed of. I really question if they would have put in that clause know if they knew how far weapons technology would go.