• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mac OSX on x86

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
How would it be illegal if you already have a copy of Tiger and modify it to work on x86 through some utility or something like that ?

Read the license.

EDIT: And I doubt the Tiger license covers post-Tiger versions. I'm not sure if OS X x86 counts as Tiger or not, so again, read the license.
 
How would it be illegal if you already have a copy of Tiger and modify it to work on x86 through some utility or something like that ?

Some utility to convert PPC binaries to x86? If something like that existed, don't you think people wouldn't complain about closed source tools not running on other architectures?
 
Originally posted by: Nothinman
How would it be illegal if you already have a copy of Tiger and modify it to work on x86 through some utility or something like that ?

Some utility to convert PPC binaries to x86? If something like that existed, don't you think people wouldn't complain about closed source tools not running on other architectures?


I am just talking in theory.
 
I am just talking in theory.

Even so, I believe the license states that you're only allowed to use it on official Apple hardware, so you'd still have to use it on one of their x86 machines.
 
Back
Top