Luckiest Rape Victim in America

[Atomic Playboy]

Let them find new jobs, and throw them to the wolves of public attention, but I wouldn't throw them in jail unless the teen claims he was raped, forced, or harmed.

He's not legally qualified to judge that as he was still a minor and unable to give consent when the actions occurred. Age of consent laws aren't perfect (this case being a shining example) but they're the best we've got and they are the law.

 

[MtnMan]

One reaches to the height of ones ability. The act is sex, while wonderful, is nothing compared to the act is love and sex. If you don't dnow this, you do not know it. You will feel just fine. It is only lovers who we'll be capable of pitying you, but they won't have time.

Has it been that long since you were a 16 year-old male with a raging erection?

 

[Jaskalas]

He's not legally qualified to judge that as he was still a minor and unable to give consent when the actions occurred. Age of consent laws aren't perfect (this case being a shining example) but they're the best we've got and they are the law.

Do you think those two are a danger to society?

 

[Pulsar]

So the law says as long is one is attractive, one can rape anyone they feel like, is that what you are saying? Attractive adult male raping a minor female - that is ok? Attractive female raping minor male - that is ok?

But if the rapist was not attractive then that would be wrong?

Ahhh. The smell of intellectual dishonesty.

 

[Pulsar]

Good post, agree 100%.

So let me ask a set of very serious questions.

A person extremely close to the age of consent has willing sex with two hot women and brags about it.

Is he really a victim? In my opinion, he's only a victim in the sense that the law must call him that because "A guy who really wanted to bang two hot teachers at the same time" just doesn't sound good in court for their case.

Should the two teachers in question lose their jobs? Absolutely, immediately, without argument. It's a rule, it's a law, and that's that.

Should they be tried for rape? Not in a million years.

 

[Moonbeam]

Has it been that long since you were a 16 year-old male with a raging erection?

Like I said. If you don't know you don't know. The soul yearns for union with a the beloved and fools confuse that with the momentary intensity of climax.

 

[Victorian Gray]

Now it's you that evidently doesn't understand the English language, I was pounding her in a manly way.

 

[MrPickins]

Should the two teachers in question lose their jobs? Absolutely, immediately, without argument. It's a rule, it's a law, and that's that.

Should they be tried for rape? Not in a million years.

Statutory rape is also against the law. :whiste:

 

[Atomic Playboy]

Do you think those two are a danger to society?

Of course not, but I also think that our laws concerning sexuality and age of consent are absurdly puritan. It's not about what I think though; they broke the law (assuming they actually did the deed in question).

 

[soulcougher73]

Im lost. Was he raped or was it consensual sex? Did they fuck him against his will and he couldnt get them off (no pun intended) lol?

 

[Atomic Playboy]

Im lost. Was he raped or was it consensual sex? Did they fuck him against his will and he couldnt get them off (no pun intended) lol?

It was statutory rape; legally, he couldn't consent.

 

[soulcougher73]

It was statutory rape; legally, he couldn't consent.

But if two 16 year olds have consenting sex its ok? This is a dumb rule lol

 

[werepossum]

Let them find new jobs, and throw them to the wolves of public opinion, but I wouldn't throw them in jail unless the teen claims he was raped, forced, or harmed.

I dunno, I think a couple hundred hours of community service (no pun intended) is definitely in order. If a teacher is planning on leaving anyway, I wouldn't want to give her the idea that it's okay to knock off a piece of 16 year old tail on the way out.

Full disclosure, my answer would have differed considerably at 16, when I was convinced I was not only an adult but THE adult.

Has it been that long since you were a 16 year-old male with a raging erection?

And whose was it? <rimshot>

So let me ask a set of very serious questions.

A person extremely close to the age of consent has willing sex with two hot women and brags about it.

Is he really a victim? In my opinion, he's only a victim in the sense that the law must call him that because "A guy who really wanted to bang two hot teachers at the same time" just doesn't sound good in court for their case.

Should the two teachers in question lose their jobs? Absolutely, immediately, without argument. It's a rule, it's a law, and that's that.

Should they be tried for rape? Not in a million years.

+1

At 16, I make a considerable difference between an adult who talked someone into something and an adult who merely had to not object. Although, it's worth acknowledging that while I do support the double standard, 16 year old girls are some of G-d's own horniest creatures, so I do realize that my differentiation and my double standard are not a particularly good fit.

 

[blankslate]

Apparently aside from the actual age of consent issue the male "victim" wanted to be "molested" by those two teachers

http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news...student-turns-self-in-to-authorities/28354842

According to the KPD, an investigation began after the St. Charles Parish Sheriff's Office was notified by school administrators that the teen was bragging to other students about his relationship with the teachers. It took place Sept. 12 in Kenner, officials said.

Investigators confirmed Wednesday afternoon that all three reportedly were together at the home until the early-morning hours of Sept 13. The house belonged to Respess and is the only incident authorities are looking into at this time, officials said.

Deputies with the SCPSO interviewed the student who provided an account of what allegedly happened with Respess and Dufresne. He told them it was consensual.

oh yeah this....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rUmuj_QD_4&t=0m28s



....

 

[Pulsar]

Statutory rape is also against the law. :whiste:

No whistling needed. It's against the law. Now, whether that law is a good one or not, we'll have to leave up to Jury Nullification to settle.

 

[DucatiMonster696]

Apparently aside from the actual age of consent issue the male "victim" wanted to be "molested" by those two teachers

http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news...student-turns-self-in-to-authorities/28354842




oh yeah this....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rUmuj_QD_4&t=0m28s



....

So basically this 16 year old isn't curled up in a ball weeping about "being robbed of the greatest gift he could ever have had" and he definitely is more than likely is not the person who made the criminal complaint, i.e. it was probably school officials, the DA's office, etc who caught wind of this teen's exploits as he bragged about it to his friends.

 

[werepossum]

So basically this 16 year old isn't curled up in a ball weeping about "being robbed of the greatest gift he could ever have had" and he definitely is more than likely is not the person who made the criminal complaint, i.e. it was probably school officials, the DA's office, etc who caught wind of this teen's exploits as he bragged about it to his friends.

I'm guessing that now he is curled up in a ball weeping about "being robbed of the greatest gift he could ever have had" - and I don't mean his virginity.

 

[waggy]

I'm guessing that now he is curled up in a ball weeping about "being robbed of the greatest gift he could ever have had" - and I don't mean his virginity.

then he should have kept his mouth shut.


While he wanted it that has nothing to do with it. At 16 he can't give consent to have sex.

This is not the same as 2 16 yr olds having sex. this was 2 adults abusing the authority they had over the boy. they should have known better and not done it. what they did is against the law (because again 16 yr olds can't give consent to have sex). it is rape.

just because the boy may have enjoyed it has nothing to do with it.

 

[werepossum]

then he should have kept his mouth shut.


While he wanted it that has nothing to do with it. At 16 he can't give consent to have sex.

This is not the same as 2 16 yr olds having sex. this was 2 adults abusing the authority they had over the boy. they should have known better and not done it. what they did is against the law (because again 16 yr olds can't give consent to have sex). it is rape.

just because the boy may have enjoyed it has nothing to do with it.

I think it has a lot to do with it. Witness that the teachers are not being charged with rape. (Louisiana doesn't even recognize statutory rape; it's either rape, or it's felony or misdemeanor "carnal knowledge of a juvenile".

Although it will be interesting to see if the ladies are being charged with felony or misdemeanor "carnal knowledge of a juvenile". There is a huge difference in sentencing, and I've not seen the media address it either way. Being in positions of authority (just the way I like my women in threesomes ) would argue for the former, but I'm guessing that given the age, behavior and likely size of the student, this probably goes into deferred charges with mandatory sex addict counselling.

The people who have my sympathy here are not the ladies and certainly not the "victim", but the husband and especially the children of Dufresne. They did nothing wrong, but are having their lives shattered.

 

[Darwin333]

What does it matter how it "sounds". The law is what it is and this was rape. Period.

Actually it was statutory rape. Period.

There is a difference that is why we have different laws for them and as you said, the law is what it is.

 

[Darwin333]

I prefer them shaved but thats just me.

 

[waggy]

The people who have my sympathy here are not the ladies and certainly not the "victim", but the husband and especially the children of Dufresne. They did nothing wrong, but are having their lives shattered.

/this

i feel for the families. i don't understand it when people do something stupid.

I mentioned in one thread a friend of my daughters was raped by her step-dad from 5-11. this man is now in jail. the family has to sell off the house, the cars, everything. because this man couldn't keep his dick out of a child.

it just blows my mind that you would do something so fuckign stupid and how badly it hurts the family

 

[1prophet]

then he should have kept his mouth shut.


While he wanted it that has nothing to do with it. At 16 he can't give consent to have sex.

This is not the same as 2 16 yr olds having sex. this was 2 adults abusing the authority they had over the boy. they should have known better and not done it. what they did is against the law (because again 16 yr olds can't give consent to have sex). it is rape.

just because the boy may have enjoyed it has nothing to do with it.

Yet if he got one of them pregnant the state can go after him for child support for what he legally couldn't give consent to.

 

[Darwin333]

I think it has a lot to do with it. Witness that the teachers are not being charged with rape. (Louisiana doesn't even recognize statutory rape; it's either rape, or it's felony or misdemeanor "carnal knowledge of a juvenile".

Although it will be interesting to see if the ladies are being charged with felony or misdemeanor "carnal knowledge of a juvenile". There is a huge difference in sentencing, and I've not seen the media address it either way. Being in positions of authority (just the way I like my women in threesomes ) would argue for the former, but I'm guessing that given the age, behavior and likely [/b]size of the student[/b], this probably goes into deferred charges with mandatory sex addict counselling.

Length or girth?

The people who have my sympathy here are not the ladies and certainly not the "victim", but the husband and especially the children of Dufresne. They did nothing wrong, but are having their lives shattered.

Unfortunately you are 100% correct. That has to be horrible for the poor family. Not only does the husband find out his wife is cheating but the entire nation finds out at roughly the same time, kids seeing the story play out on the news, utter humiliation, etc... Poor bastard is going to have to leave the state I bet, I damn sure would in his situation.

I still can't find a reason to feel bad for the "victim", I would have very happily traded places with him and took the horror of this unthinkable crime personally at age 16 (well, pretty much any day after puberty) if I could have, I'm just that kind of nice guy I guess.

 

[dainthomas]

then he should have kept his mouth shut.


While he wanted it that has nothing to do with it. At 16 he can't give consent to have sex.

This is not the same as 2 16 yr olds having sex. this was 2 adults abusing the authority they had over the boy. they should have known better and not done it. what they did is against the law (because again 16 yr olds can't give consent to have sex). it is rape.

just because the boy may have enjoyed it has nothing to do with it.

Exactly. It is well known that young teenage girls being abused by adults can orgasm during the abuse. Charges shouldn't be dismissed if they enjoyed it.