Low SCSI transfer speeds

BatmanNate

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
12,444
2
81
I have my rig set up with a Seagate Cheetah 18GB 10k RPM HD as my boot drive, and it runs off of a UltraWide (40mb/s) Tekram card. According to Sandra, it's quite a bit slower than all competition, including ATA66. Is there something I'm doing wrong, or do I just need a faster card? Sandra 2k1 gave it something above 14,000 for the score I believe it was. Thanks in advance!
 

Tweakin

Platinum Member
Feb 7, 2000
2,532
0
71
First off, I would make sure that the "Write Cache Enabled" is checked. My second thought is that if your system is OC'd, you might be running a bus speed which exceeds the SCSI Chip. I have noticed that my throughput on both my Tekram and Adaptec go down abouve 36Mhz. That equates to a 110 or 140 bus speed, if your board automatically selects for 100 or 133 bus. Try these and see what happens.
 

yazz

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
702
0
0

does it really matter? SCSI will be superior cause it can do multiple operations simultaneously. (like read and write, unlike single threaded IDE)
 

Ben

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,585
0
76
Try a different benchmark.

What model drive do you have? That Tekram card is probably hurting your score. If you want the best performance you'll need an Ultra2 or Ultra160 controller.
 

Woodie

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2001
2,747
0
0
FWIW, my HD benchmarks with Sandra were abysmally low. And that's on a SCSI RAID subsytem.

I've heard that Sandra for HD is not a reliable benchmark. There isn't much I'm going to do about it at this point anyway, so I haven't bothered doing more with it.

You can try HDTach, but the free version won't run under NT/2K. :(

--Woodie