In a previous thread, I mentioned that I had recently picked up a SFF Dell Opti GX260 and have been looking for a decent low-profile AGP card to complement the system. I already have a "main gaming rig" which runs a 9800 Pro, so I probably won't be using this system for gaming much, although it would make for a nice LAN party box.
After much research, I found my choices were limited to a few GF 4 440MX cards, a Radeon 7500, Radeon 9200SE, 9600SE, and a few others not worth mentioning. Digging further, I've found several 128-bit cards, including a Radeon 9100 (64MB), Asus V9520 (Geforce FX 5200 128MB), and an ultra-rare ELSA Gladiac 628LP, which uses a GeForce 4 Ti4200, available in both 64 and 128MB flavors. Problem with the latter choice is that it seems to be only available in Japan.
I'd like some thoughts on the performance of these choices. Am I correct by ordering the latter three by putting the ELSA on top, followed by the FX 5200, then the Radeon 9100? I'm beginning to think the PCB on Asus V9520 isn't a true "low-profile" size, so I may end up with the Radeon 9100 64MB.
After much research, I found my choices were limited to a few GF 4 440MX cards, a Radeon 7500, Radeon 9200SE, 9600SE, and a few others not worth mentioning. Digging further, I've found several 128-bit cards, including a Radeon 9100 (64MB), Asus V9520 (Geforce FX 5200 128MB), and an ultra-rare ELSA Gladiac 628LP, which uses a GeForce 4 Ti4200, available in both 64 and 128MB flavors. Problem with the latter choice is that it seems to be only available in Japan.
I'd like some thoughts on the performance of these choices. Am I correct by ordering the latter three by putting the ELSA on top, followed by the FX 5200, then the Radeon 9100? I'm beginning to think the PCB on Asus V9520 isn't a true "low-profile" size, so I may end up with the Radeon 9100 64MB.