Finally got my system stable and running thanks to help from other threads, but now im a bit suprised with my results from 3d mark03.
I know some people dont like 3d mark, but the point is that my mates system scored around 5300 and i got 4800.
His system is an AMD XP 1.6Ghz, 1GB 333Mhz RAM, ATI 9800 pro not overclocked. Mine is AMD64 2.2Ghz, 1GB 400Mhz RAM, ATI 9800 pro not overclocked. Both machines running XP SP1
So what could be the reasons for my system getting such a bad score, has anyone else got a similar system and run 3dMark?
I havent messed around with mem timings or anything they are all set by SPD.
any sugestions?
I know some people dont like 3d mark, but the point is that my mates system scored around 5300 and i got 4800.
His system is an AMD XP 1.6Ghz, 1GB 333Mhz RAM, ATI 9800 pro not overclocked. Mine is AMD64 2.2Ghz, 1GB 400Mhz RAM, ATI 9800 pro not overclocked. Both machines running XP SP1
So what could be the reasons for my system getting such a bad score, has anyone else got a similar system and run 3dMark?
I havent messed around with mem timings or anything they are all set by SPD.
any sugestions?