nickqt
Diamond Member
- Jan 15, 2015
- 8,122
- 9,047
- 136
If someone wants to volunteer to have the procedure done, then let them. If the state is using coercion then it becomes a different matter altogether.I watched a documentary years ago where prisoners' were opting to be chemically castrated as part of a study.
They actually preferred it, the serial predators said under the treatment their lives were better as they were no longer 'driven' the one guy said every hour everyday he had predatory thoughts.
While in the program he said the thoughts disappeared for the most part and when they did occur every few months they were easily suppressed by will.
Potentially then it could be a win for the state and the individual. I don't know how many would choose to opt for it however these predators are suffering too within their own minds, and they might want the peace that could come from it.
Coercion may not sound that bad if it's a "reduced sentence", but the coercion is that they'll have a longer sentence if they don't do it.
The reason why this is a problem is that once the precedent is set that the state has the power of coercion for this group of people no one is going to defend, they're going to extend that power over the next class of people that no one or very few people are going to defend. I'm sure the NAZIs never did anything like this or whatever, we can just let it play out and see what happens.
199 days until January 20th 2025.