Lost in all the HC stories is how Obama betrayed the left.

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
It shouldn't be forgotten their own stupidity and bumbling made it necessary.

If they were any good at politicking, they could have got much more of what they wanted.
 

dennilfloss

Past Lifer 1957-2014 In Memoriam
Oct 21, 1999
30,509
12
0
dennilfloss.blogspot.com
Obama was never really left to begin with. I mean, most of the Democratic Party is slightly right of center, not left (at least from a Canadian point of view; they're equivalent to what the Canadian party known as the Progressive Conservatives was) and Obama lies in the more right portion of that party. This is understandable as much of American politics are definitely skewed towards the right compared to the rest of the world, even their so-called left (The Democrats).
 

nonlnear

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2008
2,497
0
76
Obama was never really left to begin with. I mean, most of the Democratic Party is slightly right of center, not left (at least from a Canadian point of view; they're equivalent to what the Canadian party known as the Progressive Conservatives was) and Obama lies in the more right portion of that party.

I tell you what, I've got to give the Progressive [not]Conservatives props for killing the Reform party. Whoever got the Reform Party to swallow the poison pill ought to be nominated for the Nobel Progressive Prize. It's sadly ironic that in naming the new party they dropped the Progressive but kept the Conservative. For a brief moment there was hope, but then Canada wussed out. That's about when I decided to leave (for entirely unrelated reasons). Can't say I miss the place. Maybe I'll go to BC if the west secedes. One can hope...
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Obama was never really left to begin with. I mean, most of the Democratic Party is slightly right of center, not left (at least from a Canadian point of view; they're equivalent to what the Canadian party known as the Progressive Conservatives was) and Obama lies in the more right portion of that party. This is understandable as much of American politics are definitely skewed towards the right compared to the rest of the world, even their so-called left (The Democrats).

That is not what he said though. He pimped single payer in campaign and the public option is a wayyyyy watered down form of single payer. In fact all it does is force businesses to compete against the "ineffecint' Govt.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Obama was never really left to begin with. I mean, most of the Democratic Party is slightly right of center, not left (at least from a Canadian point of view; they're equivalent to what the Canadian party known as the Progressive Conservatives was) and Obama lies in the more right portion of that party. This is understandable as much of American politics are definitely skewed towards the right compared to the rest of the world, even their so-called left (The Democrats).

It really depends on the issues. For example, many on the left in Canada support the monarchy which would be even more to the right than anything in the USA.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
That is not what he said though. He pimped single payer in campaign and the public option is a wayyyyy watered down form of single payer. In fact all it does is force businesses to compete against the "ineffecint' Govt.

Maybe once in office he reviewed his options and decided single payer wasn't realistic or desirable. Progressives share the lack of will to conduct self-introspection/due diligence of their pet ideas in the same way that conservatives do. The way that progressives have charged ahead "damn the torpedoes" style reminds me of the "privatize social security" push of a few years ago.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Maybe once in office he reviewed his options and decided single payer wasn't realistic or desirable. Progressives share the lack of will to conduct self-introspection/due diligence of their pet ideas in the same way that conservatives do. The way that progressives have charged ahead "damn the torpedoes" style reminds me of the "privatize social security" push of a few years ago.

No doubt about it the left tend to be idealists just as much as right but Obama straight up said before and after election he'd have at least a public option.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/...;3A+tpmelectioncentral+(TPM+Election+Central)

Wouldn't even sign a bill w/o it, when in fact he's been working against it the whole time. You can't square this anyway you look at it. It would be like Bush saying he wanted privatization and eliminated the income cap on SS tax behind closed doors.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
That is not what he said though. He pimped single payer in campaign and the public option is a wayyyyy watered down form of single payer. In fact all it does is force businesses to compete against the "ineffecint' Govt.

Don't worry, there is a backdoor plan inside this health care bill. Some of the czars and cabinet secretaries will have the power to begin choking out private insurance companies through some price controls as time goes on.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Obama was never really left to begin with. I mean, most of the Democratic Party is slightly right of center, not left (at least from a Canadian point of view; they're equivalent to what the Canadian party known as the Progressive Conservatives was) and Obama lies in the more right portion of that party. This is understandable as much of American politics are definitely skewed towards the right compared to the rest of the world, even their so-called left (The Democrats).

Not even close he just doesn't want to LOSE it is all about a campaigning. He wants a legacy of winning and accomplishment above all else. He is More left than most think but he has compromised his principles for a "W" in the win lose column. Nothing more. He's an ego-maniac statist know-it-all. They are never wrong just ask him.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Don't worry, there is a backdoor plan inside this health care bill. Some of the czars and cabinet secretaries will have the power to begin choking out private insurance companies through some price controls as time goes on.

BUT IT DOESN"T SAY YOU CAN'T CHOOSE YOUR DOCTOR OR STAY WITH WHAT YOU HAVE EVEN IF IT COSTS $1,000,000 a month!

This isn't a secert the people that support this are in denial about it.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
That is not what he said though. He pimped single payer in campaign and the public option is a wayyyyy watered down form of single payer. In fact all it does is force businesses to compete against the "ineffecint' Govt.

He didn't pimp single payer... were you living under a rock during the campaign, or did you get your news from Rush, or what?
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Maybe once in office he reviewed his options and decided single payer wasn't realistic or desirable. Progressives share the lack of will to conduct self-introspection/due diligence of their pet ideas in the same way that conservatives do. The way that progressives have charged ahead "damn the torpedoes" style reminds me of the "privatize social security" push of a few years ago.
Charged ahead how? Are you talking about Democrats? They started negotiating from the center, and the Republicans got the bill to the right during the negotiations. Now Republicans refuse to vote for it anyway.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
No doubt about it the left tend to be idealists just as much as right but Obama straight up said before and after election he'd have at least a public option.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/...ed:+tpmelectioncentral+(TPM+Election+Central)

Wouldn't even sign a bill w/o it, when in fact he's been working against it the whole time. You can't square this anyway you look at it. It would be like Bush saying he wanted privatization and eliminated the income cap on SS tax behind closed doors.

In reality, we have a congress that is very conservative and are more concerned with staying a career politician/keeping things the same than helping the country.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Don't worry, there is a backdoor plan inside this health care bill. Some of the czars and cabinet secretaries will have the power to begin choking out private insurance companies through some price controls as time goes on.

I sure hope so, but I am not optimistic.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
He didn't pimp single payer... were you living under a rock during the campaign, or did you get your news from Rush, or what?

Where do you get yours?

Obama, speaking at SEIU's New Leadership Health Care Forum on March 24, 2007, said, "My commitment is to make sure that we have universal healthcare for all Americans by the end of my first term as President."


http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-in-03-id-like-to-see-a-single-payer-health-care-plan/

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...-he-wanted-eliminate-private-health-insurance

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...ama-wants-a-single-payer-system-52699182.html

I know... but those are rightwingnuts websites... don't read the text then... just listen to Obama's words.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Bush can start 2 wars and get the vast majority of democrats to support it. Its pretty sad when Bush makes Obama look like a bumbling idiot.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
You will after we get the R's in charge of everything again.

I'm not sure I see the big difference between the Democrats and the Republicans.
The Democrats are in favor of H-1B and L-1 visas and other work visas which displace Americans from knowledge-based, often college-education-requiring jobs. The Republicans are also in favor of H-1B and L-1 visas and other work visas.

The Democrats are in favor of mass legal immigration and are soft on illegal immigration. The Republicans are also in favor of mass legal immigration and are soft on illegal immigration.

The Democrats refuse to address foreign outsourcing nor acknowledge it as a serious economic problem. The Republicans refuse to address foreign outsourcing nor acknowledge it as a serious economic problem.

The Democrats refuse to propose real socialized medicine. The Republicans oppose socialized medicine.

The Democrats refuse to address population explosion nor acknowledge it as a problem. The Republicans refuse to address population explosion nor acknowledge it as a problem.
So what is the big difference between them? In terms of basic economic policy they seem almost the same. I think the Democrats are a little better than the Republicans on economic issues, but not by much. The only good thing about the Democrats is that they are not religious wackos. As far as I'm concerned, they all stink and all but a small handful of our Congressmen should have their assets seized, their U.S. citizenship revoked, and be deported out of the U.S.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
I'm not sure I see the big difference between the Democrats and the Republicans.
The Democrats are in favor of H-1B and L-1 visas and other work visas which displace Americans from knowledge-based, often college-education-requiring jobs. The Republicans are also in favor of H-1B and L-1 visas and other work visas.

The Democrats are in favor of mass legal immigration and are soft on illegal immigration. The Republicans are also in favor of mass legal immigration and are soft on illegal immigration.

The Democrats refuse to address foreign outsourcing nor acknowledge it as a serious economic problem. The Republicans refuse to address foreign outsourcing nor acknowledge it as a serious economic problem.

The Democrats refuse to propose real socialized medicine. The Republicans oppose socialized medicine.

The Democrats refuse to address population explosion nor acknowledge it as a problem. The Republicans refuse to address population explosion nor acknowledge it as a problem.
So what is the big difference between them? In terms of basic economic policy they seem almost the same. I think the Democrats are a little better than the Republicans on economic issues, but not by much. The only good thing about the Democrats is that they are not religious wackos. As far as I'm concerned, they all stink and all but a small handful of our Congressmen should have their assets seized, their U.S. citizenship revoked, and be deported out of the U.S.

It's all Crips vs Bloods in politics now. It's all about representing your colors, everyone has blinders on to the fact we keep electing the same goddamn "gangsters" into power, regardless of R or D.
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
The left doesn't want this, the right doesn't want this, and the center doesn't want this.

Why exactly are they passing this?