Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Ackmed
But since you're anti-Sony, and claim "everything Sony makes is crap", I guess I can see why you would defend MS about this. Even funnier, because you've said, "I hate price gougers" on these very forums. Funny how you change your tune.
Good God, stalk much?
Why did you only pick and choose what you want to out of a quote from NEARLY TWO YEARS AGO. Here's the whole thing for everyone, since you're apparently retarded enough to spend your time searching old posts of mine and hand picking what you wanna use from them. Seems to me like I'm pretty much in support of people charging whatever they feel like for an item as long as someone is willing to pay it.
Originally posted by: Injury
I hate price gougers, but people are buying them from him. It's not like he's hoarding them and keeping them in a closet so your poor, wii-starved children have their Christmas ruined. It was well-known a few months ago when the wii was readily available that it would be selling out again this season. Should have moved faster rather than trying to guilt-trip people using your three children as an excuse months later.
Welcome to America.
http://dictionary.reference.co...ictionary&q=capitalism
I'm not defending MS, I'm defending the basis of our freaking economy. I don't care if Sony wants to charge $1,000,000 for the PS3 or if Microsoft wants to charge "your first born son" for the next Halo title, I'll defend their decision to do so. I may think it's a bad choice, but I'll defend it.
Originally posted by: Injury
After 3 PS2s with unrepairable DRE's, 2 Cameras (one with unknown mechanical failures and one that frequently corrupted memory), 2 Memory Sticks that had traces just randomly break and my parent's VIAO that needed more or less every part except the HDD replaced in less than a year, I'm willing to stand behind the statement that everything Sony makes is crap.
No thanks, Sony. I don't want your cheap shit.
It's not because I hate the PS3, it's because every product I've ever bought bearing the Sony logo has crapped out on me in an unreasonable amount of time. Multiple PS2s, Cameras, Computers, Audio Equipment... it's really pure coincidence that a company I've had bad experiences with happens to make the PS3.
But let's move on (if you can get over things that were said in 2007, that is.)
First off, I want to know what sort of market research you've done into the subject because when you say "Selling their HD's at a comparable price, would increase sales, thats a fact." you DO need
actual data (not just your opinion) to back up a claim that something is a
fact.
It seems to me like the idea here is that
they are going to sell more hard drives than they had before because they are creating a need for them.
The people who bought the Arcade unit are usually casual gamers with only a handful of games. Probably the type of people that play 0-10 hours a week. While I'm not going to be the kind of idiot that claims something as fact without having any actual data, I'd put money on 90% of arcade units being bought either for a young child who probably won't be downloading any sort of content and will probably never connect to XBL or a young to middle-aged adult who wants to play a sports game from time to time. I mean, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that if someone bought the arcade unit they probably weren't looking to do much, if any, content downloading. So I really have no pity on the people that don't have a HD because most of them probably don't care.
The people with the Elites have 120GB. I have an Elite, I bought it because I didn't want to have to worry about upgrading the hard drive. I have half a dozen games installed to my HD, I have tons of DLC, and I'm barely using half of my HD space. I'm not concerned about running out of space. Based on my usage, and similar results from other users that I've read here, I'm going to guess that's not too far from the norm. Which leads me to believe that only a small percentage of people really need (and by need I mean "want") a hard drive bigger than 120GB. Sure, there are people that have a ridiculously large library of games and insist on installing them all and they keep loads of music on their 360 etc. etc... but these people probably make up waaaaayyyy less than 1% of 360 owners. Why would MS be targeting the smallest market?
The beef of my argument is here: MS has now launched multiple services to help you fill up those hard drives fast. You can download games, you can copy your games to your hard drive, you can download all sorts of add-on content for your games. The catch is that most of the games you can download you can buy used at gamestop for the same price, if not a couple bucks cheaper. So why would they offer them for download? Because MS is going to increase the sales of their 120GB hard drives (which are probably high-profit items) because people now have more of a reason to buy them than ever. Knowing the balls MS has, I wouldn't put this past them. If that's the case, that's a pretty damn good reason to not lower the price of HDs. And pretty smart, too. It's taking a page directly out of Apple's book (as in, selling music on iTunes to increase iPod sales.)
You can call me a fanboy all you want. I'm not. I'd have a PS3 if I had a reason to have one. Also, I really don't CARE if MS overprices their HDs because I already have a 120GB. I have no reason to argue other than to support a smart business decision. But it if you know anything about MS, you know this is a strong possibility. Also, if you know anything about the American economy, you know MS will lower their prices when they are damn well ready and that you won't starve or anything if it's no time soon.