• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Looking for an all in one board for a cheap solaris/debian box

Nitemare

Lifer
I'm going to be building a dual boot Solaris 9/Debian box and add it to my local network at home 2000 and XP. It's basically to tinker with and learn it more. I will eventually install Apache and start using it as a web server for an online business.

Right now I am leaning towards the Asus A7N266 and have noticed that they have either VM, AA or C after it. What does this mean and is this a good choice or would you recommend another board instead?

How is the video and sound quality on the board?
 
I suggest you get something with a VIA chipset, for proper, open source, chipset and graphics support.

E.g. ECS K7VMM+ aka PC-Chips M825LU. This even comes with a premounted, non-upgradeable Duron CPU if you want - for way below $100.
 
The K7VMM+ was one of the others that I was looking at. I was leaning towards the A7N266 because of the extra PCI slot and I've heard the SIS video on that board is pretty bad

nforce <> good linux boards?
 
K7VMM uses a VIA chipset, and of course VIA S3 graphics. Maybe you're mixing that up with K7SOM+?

nForce in Linux is not really a good idea because of NVidia's non-open approach to drivers.
 
Originally posted by: Peter
K7VMM uses a VIA chipset, and of course VIA S3 graphics. Maybe you're mixing that up with K7SOM+?

nForce in Linux is not really a good idea because of NVidia's non-open approach to drivers.

Doh! ECS needs to work on their naming convention. thanks
 
Back
Top