- Jul 14, 2005
- 30,056
- 98
- 91
fiber vs gigabit ethernet is no different other than the distance limitations which usually don't exist in most homes. Also fiber is a lot more fragile than ethernet...sure it can take a beating for non-glass / LED type....but ethernet wins in this arena.
If you are talking 10G, then that is like asking for a car that can do 0-60 in 3 secs, turn 30mpg and cost less than $10k. If you are trying to aggregate 20G, then you are asking for the above and them paying you $20k to take it off their hands
I will say unless you are running something like a nice synology box, you switch is not going to be the bottleneck.
keep in mind that low cost switches (and even some very high cost ones) cannot do 100% of their port capacity. Also a lot of the companies that sell 4/8/12/24/48 port switches often have the same backplane shared across the board which is a big reason why there is not a jump much in price.
www.smallnetbuilder.com is a great resource.
How much performance do your VM's really need?
10G would be pretty awesome. Thanks for the link. I'll check it out.
Our VM's don't really need that much performance but they are running on some sort of RAID bassed off of SSds