Looking for a new shooter

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Been debating between Gears of War 2 for 360, Resistance 2 for PS3, or Kill Zone 2 for PS3. Basically I can't decide which one to get.

I'm looking for a new shooter/fps game for my consoles. Something that isn't available on PC.

Which to go with? These games aren't brand new, but I have been neglecting my consoles for a while lately. Time to dive in. I realize GoW2 is not a FPS, but a 3rd person game. That doesn't change my mind one way or the other to be honest. Reviews of all 3 are pretty close and they all seem to be popular. Online isn't a big deal to me at all, probably won't touch it.

Help me decide.
 

oznerol

Platinum Member
Apr 29, 2002
2,476
0
76
www.lorenzoisawesome.com
I don't own a PS3, and I still have a sealed copy of Gears 2 waiting to be played, but out of those 3 I'd choose Killzone 2. It's probably not the cheapest option, though, as the other 2 have been out longer.
 

IndieSnob

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2001
1,340
0
0
Gears of War 2 is a great game, but part of what makes it so great is playing Horde mode via XBL.



 

ubercaffeinated

Platinum Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,130
0
71
i've played all three, and i'm gonna suggest killzone 2 for the multiplayer - it's highly reminiscent of cod4, but it isn't perfect. r2 is good for the single player but sucks for multiplayer. gow2 is okay all around, but it still didn't capture my attention.
 

JoPh

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2002
7,312
1
76
gow 2.

i disagree i have had a lot fund with resis2 multiplayer. the coop mode is really fun. but i thnk the player base is really shrinking...

id put gow2 at the top then toss up between kz2/r2
 

Kabob

Lifer
Sep 5, 2004
15,248
0
76
Never played the PS3 games but I still struggle to recommend GoW 2 as not all the bugs are fixed STILL (or so I've heard). But between the three I guess it'd be my option.
 

JoPh

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2002
7,312
1
76
Originally posted by: kabob983
Never played the PS3 games but I still struggle to recommend GoW 2 as not all the bugs are fixed STILL (or so I've heard). But between the three I guess it'd be my option.

if online isnt a big deal to him i dont think he has to worry to much about the bugs...


 

Kabob

Lifer
Sep 5, 2004
15,248
0
76
True, but he didn't say online wasn't a big deal. :p All of those games have substantial multiplayer components.
 

R Nilla

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2006
3,835
1
0
Killzone 2's campaign is pretty solid, but my vote goes to Gears of War 2. I've completed the campaign at least 3 or 4 times. Chainsawing locusts and popping heads with the sniper rifle never gets old. You definitely should give online co-op and Horde mode a try, or at least local co-op. These modes add a significant amount of replayability that you won't necessarily find in Killzone 2.

I haven't played Resistance 2, but I couldn't bring myself to finish the first one.

EDIT: Also, for GoW2, Horde mode doesn't technically have to be played online (but is more fun with some friends), and even the multiplayer matches can be played offline with bots, if that makes any difference.

Killzone 2 also has bot matches but I've never tried it. The multiplayer mode is spectacular, though.
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
If you played GoW and liked it, GoW2 is more of the same... If you haven't played GoW, pick it up instead (it's cheaper), and if you like it pick GoW2 for more of the same.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Again I see it's a mixed bag as far as recommendations go.

I'm leaning toward Killzone 2 for some reason. Thanks for the info and opinions.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,767
6,646
126
If you are going for single player experience, I'd go ...

Resistance 2 > Gears of War 2 > Killzone 2

R2 is my single favorite player FPS of the current Gen.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,499
33,590
146
GoW2 Horde keeps me coming back. The Grind Yard from the Snow Blind map pack, is the closest thing to a perfect horde map yet, IMO of course. Very relaxing to play with others, but not have to compete directly against them.
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
I own both systems and at one point owned all three of those games.

All three of those games have major faults that led me I turning them into gamestop, but if those are the only choices, then this is how I would rank them:

1. Gears of War 2 - it angers me to recommend this as the best game because I was so excited to get this game at midnight when it launched. It ended up being a real big let down to me. It wasn't a let down because it was a bad game, rather because they took too much of he original gears away from it. IMO it looked like gears, sounded like gears, but it did not play like gears. From my experience, those who loved the first gears didn't like GoW2 and those who hated GoW1, absolutely loved GoW2. Online system drove me nuts and I often got stuck in laggy games so I gave up on it.

I'm recommending it for solid single player, horde mode and lots of xbl game types.

2. Killzone 2 - I thouht this was a great single player game that was well presented. The single player was amazing until the last quarter when the novelty wore off and it became just another shooter.

The real potential in this game was in multiplayer. I like the idea of persistent ranks and classes. It really sucks for someone just startin out though. You are limited to the base rifleman class and can only use the assualt rifle from each side. You'll find yourself getting smashed by people who have sniper rifles, rocket launchers and who can cloak. The thing that killed it for me was that KZ2 uses dedicated servers. Great right? Not if you live on the west coast. I kept wondering why every single game I joined was laggy. After getting fed up I looked in my router logs and saw that my ps3 was conecting to the same group of ip addresses every time I played online. I ran trace route after trace route to all the iPs I was connecting to and they were all on the east coast! My trace routes would hit 11 hops before finally getting dropped. From San Diego till they were dropped in virginia, I was averaging 150ms. Fuck that. What kind of BS is that?

3. Resistence 2 - this was by the far the worst on your list and really doesn't even belong in the same topic as the other 2 games IMO. This is one of the most boring and repetitive shooters around, much like the first resistance. Single player was dull, the story unexciting, and I had to force myself to finish just so I didn't waste my time getting half way through.
The graphics are by far the worst out of these three games. I hated the orange hue everything had and the 2D graphics! I know all games use 2d to some degree, but resistance was just foul and obnoxious. Every time you make an enemy explode, what you get is a bunch of little 2d sprites. I didn't notice it at first, but my god, once I put my finger on it, I thought I was playing the orginal doom on pc back in 1995. The multiplayer is the most vanilla of the three. R2 online was the first time I had seen the bunny hop + shoot rocket at feet move since quake 3 I think.

I recommend you get GoW2, if you're on the eat coast killzone wouldn't be a bad choice, but you have been warned about resistance.
 

hans030390

Diamond Member
Feb 3, 2005
7,326
2
76
I'd have to say Killzone 2, though I can't say it strongly if you're not interested in MP (by far the best part). R2 had a decent campaign, though I liked the original more (I can't stand R2's MP, loved R1). I'm not a huge fan of the GoW games, so naturally I wouldn't list it first.