Originally posted by: Matilda
i prefer tomtoms. they run off of tele atlas maps (more accurate, IMO). the 130S/330S both have text-to-speech. they just came out with new models a little bit ago. the GO 930 is pretty sweet too.
It really depends on what version of map each GPS manufacture obtained.
Take Garmin NT navigator 2009. It is actually Navteq 4Q 2007 version.
Take Magellan version 31+. It is Navteq 1Q 2008 version.
TomTom V8 is suppose to be 2Q 2008 TeleAtlas map.
Most of time, we confuse between POI vs actual Address, therefore, when choosing a GPS, I will suggest look into its routing engine. ( how fast and efficient your gps guide you from point A to point B )
Why some people think Navteq is better?
In general, Navteq equipped GPS such as Garmin and Magellan provide better routing than TeleAtlas equipped TomTom or Mio. ( there are enough article doing side by side comparision on the web ) So if you are daily driver, I actually would suggest Navteq.
But then, if you are looking for great POI database, then you really should go w/ TeleAtlas.
Everyone has it own preferences, such as... (take nuvi 2xx vs tomtom 1xx series - all real life testing not manufacture spec )
1. better screen. ( Nuvi is much better )
2. battery life. ( Nuvi 5 hours, TT less than 100 min )
3. UI ( hmm......... my wife found nuvi is easier, but again, this is hard to rate )
4. customization. ( TT is better )
5. portability ( similar to battery life per charge )
6. accuracy ( Sirf/Bravo/MTK vs Hammerhead - I have to said Hammerhead is better )
7. Satallite acqusistion speed. ( Nuvi MTK is faster )
8. Signal strength. ( MTK kick SiRF's behind )
9. via point. ( TT is better )
10. other functions... ( TT has more functions )
bare in mind, there is no such things as "perfect" gps.