- Dec 11, 2000
- 12,273
- 4
- 81
I am looking for a cheap PCI sata Raid5 card for two of these (250 gig hdd). Hardware raid is important and I just wanted to get thoughts from those of you in the know. Thanks in advance.
You don't need to install a driver in most cases, but the card's firmware will still be loaded into your system during boot and will use the system CPU for all RAID calculations - just like any other software-based RAID solution.
Well maybe the OP's mobo doesn't support RAID natively. If that's the case, a cheap PCI/PCIe RAID card isn't totally out of the question. SiI3132 based ones can be found for ~$25 and they are 'almost' as good as Intel ICHR or NV's MCP. If it's for RAID1 especially, it's definitely superior to a pure software (OS-based) RAID.
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Actually you need to install a driver in pretty much all cases and the calculations are done in the driver, not the firmware. Firmware by definition runs on a the card and not the host CPU.
Originally posted by: buck
For learning/testing purposes, would the software raid be just as good?
Originally posted by: lopri
SiI3132 based ones can be found for ~$25 and they are 'almost' as good as Intel ICHR or NV's MCP. If it's for RAID1 especially, it's definitely superior to a pure software (OS-based) RAID.
Originally posted by: skriefal
Originally posted by: buck
For learning/testing purposes, would the software raid be just as good?
Software RAID is fine and is just as good as the cheap 'firmware' RAID cards. And some of the software RAID implementations (e.g. Linux md) are in wide use and are well tested, so reliability may even be superior to the cheap 'firmware' cards.
A good starting point would be three drives for your array plus a fourth drive for the operating system.
Hmm.. I was actually thinking the opposite since those semi-hardware controllers will be transparent to OS, thus giving the freedom and more compatibility when something happens. Different OS will support different level of RAID. I also thought there would be inevitable overhead on the OS and CPU using software RAID. (The recent fiasco of WHS coming to mind)Originally posted by: Nothinman
He specifically mentioned RAID5 and I'd still prefer a software RAID1 solution because I trust the tools more and I know that I can transplant the array to any other machine without worrying about whether the controller will like the array or not.
Correct me if I misunderstood, but a good start would be the OS on a seperate drive and three drives in raid5 for the storage? Right now in the computer I have a scsi drive running 2k3 and if that is fine and just adding the storage drives would work than I am golden.
Hmm.. I was actually thinking the opposite since those semi-hardware controllers will be transparent to OS, thus giving the freedom and more compatibility when something happens. Different OS will support different level of RAID. I also thought there would be inevitable overhead on the OS and CPU using software RAID. (The recent fiasco of WHS coming to mind)
Originally posted by: lopri
Hmm.. I was actually thinking the opposite since those semi-hardware controllers will be transparent to OS, thus giving the freedom and more compatibility when something happens.
