Gibson486
Lifer
- Aug 9, 2000
- 18,378
- 2
- 0
Originally posted by: beer
Oh yes, what did piss me off was that I had to get my REAR brakes replaced before the front ones. The pads were worn like you couldn't believe.
My auto-shop said that Mazda uses different size brake pads for the front and the rear, which causes the front to last LONGER than the rears in every car he's seen. Has anyone else seen this?
don't know, but i only have 9.5 k on mine and when you use the brakes at low speeds, you hear some rumbling. This did not happen when I first bought the car. I had a oil change two weeks prior and the dealer said my brakes were fine.
