Long time Jimmy Carter aide resigns over book

michaels

Banned
Nov 30, 2005
4,329
0
0
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/...amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-12
ATLANTA (AP) -- A longtime aide to Jimmy Carter has resigned from the Carter Center think tank, calling the former president's new book on Israel and the Arabs one-sided and filled with errors.

Kenneth Stein, the Carter Center's first executive director and founder of its Middle East program, sent a letter that bluntly criticized the book to Carter and others.

Stein wrote that the book, "Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid," was replete with factual errors, material copied from other sources and "simply invented segments," according to an excerpt of the letter published by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Deanna Congileo, Carter's spokeswoman, said the former president stands by the book.

Stein, who is also director of the Institute for the Study of Modern Israel at Emory University, did not immediately return a call Wednesday.

Carter issued a brief statement saying that Stein had not been actively involved with the center for more than 12 years and was not involved with the new book. Carter did not directly address Stein's allegations.

It is not the first time Carter and Stein have disagreed over Middle East policy, said Douglas Brinkley, a professor of history at Tulane University and the author of the 1988 Carter biography, "The Unfinished Presidency."

"They've never been on the same page in the Middle East. They've been in an almost constant state of disagreement," Brinkley said. Stein "doesn't trust the Palestinians as much as Carter."

Brinkley said he has read Carter's new book but would not address Stein's accusations.

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy.

This should get interesting....
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
So we can conclude that Stein does not see the problem right---nor does Carter---and due to the length of the whole conflict---either does anyone else.

But what we don't seem to see is the folly of waiting for a Palestinian Israeli agreement---which is the rough equivalent to waiting for all the hydrogen in the universe to be converted to helium.-------and if we ever want to see the problem solved---its going to have to come from binding third party arbitration from without.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,058
55,552
136
I'm not sure if that's true Lemon, I think people would have said similar things about the Arabs and Israelis pre Camp David as well. The two sides are constantly coming closer to what was originally intended in the UN partition of Palestine, and I think that sooner rather then later you will get the right kind of personalities in charge on both sides for them to really come to a two state agreement. I'm sure that won't totally stop the violence or anything, but... well... I see agreement in their future.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,903
10,235
136
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I think we can conclude that Stein has picked a side . . .

Islam picked our side for us. We are infidels and treated accordingly. Not one of us should be on their side until they surrender their bloodshed and war.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,803
6,360
126
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I think we can conclude that Stein has picked a side . . .

Islam picked our side for us. We are infidels and treated accordingly. Not one of us should be on their side until they surrender their bloodshed and war.

So the Islamic controls you.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I think we can conclude that Stein has picked a side . . .

Islam picked our side for us. We are infidels and treated accordingly. Not one of us should be on their side until they surrender their bloodshed and war.

So the Islamic controls you.
I tell him the jump, he tells me how high ;) Wacth us Islamics Mooslemen scare even the bogey man!
===

Interesting - I haven't read or heard of the book till right now, but if some of the allegations are true (plagiarizing?) then it doesn't bode well for the book
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I think we can conclude that Stein has picked a side . . .

Islam picked our side for us. We are infidels and treated accordingly. Not one of us should be on their side until they surrender their bloodshed and war.

Do us a favor and convert already then, you already are scared to death and the best ally they could have.
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
Carter is consistent, attack the messenger and not the message.

Carter is wrong, mostly because he is usually wrong about anything he does.

 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
To Shavetya---who writes---Carter is wrong, mostly because he is usually wrong about anything he does.

Sure sounds like circular reasoning to me---and attacking the messenger to boot----say---are you a peanut farmer also?
 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
This is just going to turn into another Israeli apologist thread. Anyone who says anything the least bit critical of Israel is going to be subject to these kinds of attacks.


*Waits patiently for dna to appear*
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Seriously, ayabe, we agreed that you'll PM me when these threads start....

As for the topic, I'll just wait and see what you guys have to say, and make a single remark: you can pretty much expect a biased/distorted view just by reading the title and looking at the picture.

OT: ayabe, I'm still waiting for you to eviscerate the BBC's own report in the other thread. Is vanishing your modus operandi when confronted with such material?
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91