Control for societal factors? That sounds prejudice to me. Are you saying that the culture of a group of people has an effect on behavior?
We both know where you’re trying to go with this and it’s going to end up in a stupid place.
Control for societal factors? That sounds prejudice to me. Are you saying that the culture of a group of people has an effect on behavior?
OP is pathetically transparent in nearly every post. And the 'who, me?' shtick always follows that up.We both know where you’re trying to go with this and it’s going to end up in a stupid place.
The indigenous peoples of... most everywhere beg to differ. It's also "harming the planet," these last 200 years of progress, attributable to so-called great britain. The inevitability of progress and the expectation of an ever increasing standard of living, until we run out of stuff to dig out of the ground, or die, is the British legacy. That and stabbing people.
Yes, I say that Japan has other societal factors that influence its suicide rate that would need to be accounted for. ie: other IVs that need to be controlled for in any model before you can isolate the effects of gun ownership.
can we say the same about the gang culture, since they believe in murder, why count those numbers?
can we say the same about the gang culture, since they believe in murder, why count those numbers?
Well, I was referring more to the long-standing Hindu/Muslim tensions (other Indian religious conflicts are available). And the caste system is indeed rather hard to defend, and the lower castes have their (well-known and long-standing, to be honest) movements against it. Including outbreaks of what you'd have to call terrorism against higher castes. Plus the mass conversion of many of them to Buddhism (though, sadly, some Buddhists at least, seem to adhere to a caste system themselves, even though it's not _supposed_ to be part of the religion...I guess it's also cultural thing).
What is interesting about that is that India is a monolith with regards to race. Even with this shared racial heritage, India suffers religious/sectarian violence. I am not sure how it compares to the West but it is there.
Britain has been white for millenia. Its demographics shifting brown has only occurred in the course of a few decades. This same phenomenon is also occurring over much of western Europe. From what I have read, many European whites are feeling threatened by this. This is my primary explanation for the rise of the alt-right (which you apparently disagree with). In general I don't believe European whites are all that interested in the flourishing of brown people in their country, they are interested in the flourishing of white people (this is something I think you would agree with).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_India
But 'race' is socially-constructed. Different societies/cultures have different ideas of what it is, so I'm not sure it makes any sense to declare that India has a 'shared racial heritage' or that Europe does not. India has always been fantastically diverse, by religion, culture, language, and skin tone. I did once suggest to an Indian friend that India was like an EU that worked, but they pointed out it didn't actually work _that_ well (just not as catastrophically badly as it might have done).
I'm afraid I don't like the tenor of your comment, even though I haven't hugely disagreed with your past comments on things. Why the emphasis on skin-tone? I don't believe that is the important issue - it's about economics, culture, a sense of control and stability. Even a lot of anxious xenophobes aren't fundamentally concerned with skin colour, that's a marker of the true racist. People don't like feeling they are losing their place in the 'queue' to new arrivals. They don't like churn and transient populations, and if they don't have money they attach all the more importance to stability and community.
When Sam L Jackson moaned about British black actors taking roles from African Americans, it struck me as being slightly similar to working class Brits upset about being undercut in the labour market by Eastern Europeans. You spend all this time at the back of the queue, and just when you are getting to the front a load of people turn up from the back of someone else's queue and appear to cut in front. (And your own queue always seems to move more slowly than all the others!).
I don't disagree that feeling threatened by immigration is a driver of support for the hard-right, but I do disagree that it's the only one, and that it's all about skin colour. A huge amount of the upset about immigration is about immigration by white people. In some small areas it's even about non-white people who've been here for a long time being upset about foreign white people coming in.
The demonstration was part of the UN's international anti-racism day.
Organisers, Stand Up to Racism Scotland, said that about 1,500 campaigners from a coalition of civic organisations, trade unions, political groups and others took to the streets.
They were protesting against the "rising tide of racism, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism and the scapegoating of refugees and migrants".
Since you actually live there you would have a much better idea about what's actually going on over there than me. I was basing my comments on the articles I posted earlier which could be absolute shit for all I know. Sorry if I got it all wrong.
Do you feel like England as a place to live has gotten better/worse/stayed the same during your lifetime? What has gotten better? What has gotten worse?
Societal or cultural? Or are they same in the context of your statement?Again, this is pointless anecdotal evidence. You understand why it’s pointless, right? That you have to control for societal factors?
Can you give me a reason why you keep ignoring actual empirical research into the topic and instead rely on blog posts? Can you give me any reason other than they tell you what you want to believe?
Societal or cultural? Or are they same in the context of your statement?
Anyway, I think the main thing I get from being a lifelong Londoner is don't do a King Canute - the world is going to go its own way and change around you, you aren't that important and are unlikely to have that much effect on it, so you are going to have to adapt.
Is this the thread where the Trumpsters have retreated to after yesterday's events?
OP is pathetically transparent in nearly every post. And the 'who, me?' shtick always follows that up.
I'm not sure I see how cultural differences can be removed from the equation without vastly skewing the results. Some cultures are inherently more violent than others. Religious beliefs also enter the equation at some point.All of the above. Competent analysis attempts to control for anything that has a significant effect on suicide rate. After all, the question we are trying to answer isn't if Japan has a higher suicide rate than the US, it's the effect of guns on suicide rate. ie: whatever Japan's suicide rate is today, what would happen if we gave everyone there a gun while everything else stayed the same? Would it go up? Down? Stay the same? (it would almost certainly go up)
You know that is so true. When you get old, change is so fucking hard to deal with. I find it is probably more difficult for myself than most people. All the popular media (movie/music) coming out is just alien to me with absolute zero resonance. For example, is there a show around that is comparable to Seinfeld? a movie that is comparable to Memento? an album that is comparable to Dark Side of the Moon or even Meddle? I would say the last thing I have watched from popular media lately that approached greatness was Key & Peele but that is about it. The new music is absolutely dead to me.
Pink Floyd told the Man to “leave those kids alone.” Beyonce wants to be the Man and ban words. Everything is safe and easily digestible — like baby food. No one expresses what’s in their heart anymore; they only want to make it to the charts, which inevitably leads to stale, superficial tracks that are “in” one week and “out” the next.
I do happen to know that the US isn't necessarily more crime-ridden than other countries. It's just your strange obsession with guns and high levels of gun ownership that has your level of mass murders so high.
I'm not sure I see how cultural differences can be removed from the equation without vastly skewing the results. Some cultures are inherently more violent than others. Religious beliefs also enter the equation at some point.
I don't know enough about statistical analyses to have a valid opinion, but it seems like that would be like trying to force an apple to be an orange so you can compare the flavor.
http://www.mandatory.com/culture/1062828-11-reasons-music-sucks-now-more-than-ever
It's not just growing old. Stuff does suck now. If only we could go back to a time when things were great...
I agree!
Take 1977 for example, here a few of the albums I own from that year.
Never Mind the Bollocks:Here are the Sex Pistols
Rumors (Fleettwood Mac)
Aja (Steely Dan)
The Idiot (Iggy Pop)
Let There Be Rock (AC/DC)
The Stranger (Billy Joel)
News of the World (Queen)
A Farewell to Kings (Rush)
Bat out of Hell (Meatloaf)
Draw the Line (Aerosmith)
Animals (Pink Floyd)
Cat Scratch Fever (Ted Nugent)
Out of the Blue (ELO)
The Clash
Talking Heads: 77
Terrapin Station (Grateful Dead)
Low (David Bowie)
Foreigner
I Robot (Alan Parsons Project)
Even in the Quietest Moments (Super Tramp)
You Get What You Play For (REO Speedwagon)
There were many years when 20 or more fantastic albums were released a year. To me 1977 had more good albums released than the last decade combined. In fact, the newest album I have is from Breaking Bemamin in 2011 and it is only ok, not great.
I think we all know the ironclad rule that the last truly good music was from whenever the person speaking was a teenager through their 20’s or so.