I asked here about that, and I don't think I got a satisfactory answer. I think it's cause lawyers are cheap asses, and they decided en masse to never upgrade their software again.
I was in a lawyer's office a couple years ago, and there was an antique sitting on the desk. I think it might have been a 286. It predated my use of IBM computers. I asked about it, and he said he still used for some software package. I can appreciate the thrift, but c'mon. Sometimes you letting go is better for everyone involved.
Not the reason, of course. Wordperfect held sway for a long time in the legal profession, long after the mass market moved to Word. Legacy issues are why.
Legal document are ultra precise in their wording. They have to be. Lawyers make their living finding minute loopholes in the legal wording of documents put forth by other lawyers.
So, most lawyers, when drawing up a document, begin with proven, legally
bullet-proof templates as their initial starting point. If you tried to reinvent the wheel each time, not only would productivity suffer, but you'd run the risk of fucking up.
Remember the days of file conversion from one word processing program to another? None ever got the formatting 100% right! Now, increase that complexity of that task by thousand of legal docs with their headers and footers and so forth.
"Don't fix what ain't broke" and inertia ruled. Any major corporation that has had to execute a change from one software program to another has experienced a
major institutional migraine. The horror stories are out there. And since legal docs are all text, WP on dos was all they ever needed.
Except . . .
What has forced many, if not most, law firms to finally change is that fact that their clients all now use Word, so for seamless interoperablity of communication they have had to swallow hard and go through the conversion nightmare.
However, IANAL, so . . .
