Lol. New 3.2 @ 3.6 5c cooler than stock 2.4c.

iwearnosox

Lifer
Oct 26, 2000
16,018
5
0
Funny, I just replaced my old 2.4c running at stock speed (it was a crappy oc'er) with a 3.2. I cranked the 3.2 to 3.6 from the start and rebooted. It's running 5c cooler than my previous 2.4.:confused:

I'm on a ic7-g, I guess I'm forced to do a 5:4 ratio on the memory at this point?
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
If you had updated BIOS around the same time, Abit "recalibrated" the CPU temperature because of many complaints.

Also, if your previous CPU's heatsink/fan was gunked up with dust, could reduce effectiveness.

[EDIT] What RAM are you running? In any case, congrats on having a faster CPU at stock speeds than anything I have right now even overclocked.
 

Mullzy

Senior member
Jan 2, 2002
352
0
0
That "recalibration" from Abit didn't do anything for me.

My 2.8c idled at 45 C before and after the update. There's no way it's really 45... but oh well!
 

Yanagi

Golden Member
Jun 8, 2004
1,678
0
0
Maybe you put on to little/much thermal paste and got it better this time?
 

Stormgiant

Senior member
Oct 25, 1999
829
0
0
I find it very hard to belive, but it can happen.

For your info, my old 2.4C M0 at 280fsb was cooler than the 2.6C and 2.8C that replaced it after at stock!!

One hell of a cpu. Last week, just for testing i exchanged my 3.0c for two Prescott ( 2.8E and 3.0E ) and none of them at stock speed came near the temperatura that the 3.0 outputs at 3900 speeds...
Very impressive...