Originally posted by: Crazyfool
I don't get it either.![]()
He's talking about this one:Originally posted by: clarkey01
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
I don't get it either.![]()
There known for thier B.S, they once said thier system had a 3400+ FX chip and thier 3dmark 03 was 20000+. Toms hardware did an artcile on them.Surprised none of you caught it.
Originally posted by: SwiftWind
He's talking about this one:Originally posted by: clarkey01
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
I don't get it either.![]()
There known for thier B.S, they once said thier system had a 3400+ FX chip and thier 3dmark 03 was 20000+. Toms hardware did an artcile on them.Surprised none of you caught it.
http://www6.tomshardware.com/column/20040317/too_good_to_be_true-01.html
It looks like they removed their claims from their site about fastest PC, and also they are now charging via credit and not just paypal...wonder if that helps or makes it worse. anyone have experience with this?
Originally posted by: DeeKnow
some poor sod trying to make a living.... leave him alone
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: SwiftWind
He's talking about this one:Originally posted by: clarkey01
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
I don't get it either.![]()
There known for thier B.S, they once said thier system had a 3400+ FX chip and thier 3dmark 03 was 20000+. Toms hardware did an artcile on them.Surprised none of you caught it.
http://www6.tomshardware.com/column/20040317/too_good_to_be_true-01.html
It looks like they removed their claims from their site about fastest PC, and also they are now charging via credit and not just paypal...wonder if that helps or makes it worse. anyone have experience with this?
LOL That was awesome, thanks for the link![]()