Attic
Diamond Member
- Jan 9, 2010
- 4,282
- 2
- 76
Wasn't my comment. I was just pointing out the double standard that exists as usual. Not one GOP'er whined about that when Ryan gave his plan. They just touted the number including that part.
If they can keep coming out and including it when they promote the Ryan budget as a savings measure they can't dismiss it here as one.
Why are you adhearing to such a weak argument by claiming Ryan's plan makes Rieds 1 trillion of imaginary savings legitamate when comparing Boehners plan vs Reid's plan.
All sides agree and acknowledge that war spending will decrease inevitably. Reid's plan has taken credit for saving a trillion dollars that neither side intended to spend. Boehners plan does not do this. How does Ryan's plan change the fact that Reid's plan includes 1 trillion in phantom savings that Boehners plan does not?
