LOL AT&T starts attack ads on Tmobile then gets this response...

[Anonemous]

http://www.tmonews.com/2013/03/t-mo...wspaper-ad-with-their-own-creative-responses/

AT&T's attack ad:

Shots fired back:

 

[darkxshade]

It's funny because it's true

I pretty much knew what they were going to say before I clicked any links.

 

[Ksyder]

Lol that is great.

I've tried att and t-mobile, and I don't ever remember having a dropped call on t-mobile. In fact the call quality has been excellent.

The data speed is another story which many around here know.... insanely fast in the city, unbearably slow in the country.

 

[Genx87]

AT&T is full of shit. There is no way any cell provider has 2x dropped\failed calls than them.

 

[highland145]

A friend works for ATT wireless. Sent her both pics. Let's see what she thinks.:whiste:

 

[SpatiallyAware]

AT&T is full of shit. There is no way any cell provider has 2x dropped\failed calls than them.

This. WTF.

It has gotten better over the past 2 years, but they have a ways to go before they can run some ad like that.

 

[SheHateMe]

I actually left AT&T for T-Mobile because AT&T was shit.

 

[Anonemous]

ATT should just fire back and just tell it like it is...

'cuz GSM Monopoly!!!

 

[Phokus]

AT&T is like the spurned lover who posts shit on facebook about their ex

 

[Schmide]

What's worse is those AT&T kid commercials, I'd rather watch a Geico commercial. (I consider Geico commercials the worst of the worst)

I gave up AT&T in 2001 for TMobile, never looked back.

 

[SheHateMe]

Yea, those ATT kid commercials were cute at first...until I saw the one with that retarded ass girl child going on about "wanting more" and sounding like she could barely breathe.

 

[Aikouka]

It's funny because it's true

At an initial read, their ad makes sense, but this really requires anyone to tear away the veil of technological ignorance, and look at this a little bit deeper. Ignoring any possible underhanded, nefarious purpose for AT&T's buyout of T-Mobile (i.e. creating a monopoly), I would consider it a fairly logical statement that AT&T wanted T-Mobile's chunk of the wireless spectrum. I say this because AT&T was eventually going to require T-Mobile customers to switch to fully AT&T-compatible phones (i.e. not 2G only), which tells me that AT&T most likely didn't care about T-Mobile's existing infrastructure. This is an important point because arguably, the largest cause of poor network performance in an area is the implementation (infrastructure) using the spectrum (e.g. too few towers, etc.).

Now, I have no idea where AT&T gets this claim from, and I'm not stating that it's true. I'm simply speaking of what I believe is the logical fallacy of T-Mobile's ad. Honestly, it's a great retort because most people don't know any better, but in reality? It's most likely utter bupkis.

 

[CPA]

A friend works for ATT wireless. Sent her both pics. Let's see what she thinks.:whiste:

Make sure she sends a pic of her back with her response. Post both.

 

[CPA]

Yea, those ATT kid commercials were cute at first...until I saw the one with that retarded ass girl child going on about "wanting more" and sounding like she could barely breathe.

Yeah, but the one who frets about turning into a werewolf than almost cries at the end is hilarious.