• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

LOL at Hardware analysis

D

DarkKnight69

Golden Member
Well, I hope that the traffic was well worth the discrediting information they published all over the net.

It was nice having them around, but i dont read reviewers who cannot publish correct information!
 
Honestly I cant remember what their predictions were, neither did I care much.

It is however interesting to note my initial reaction to the shader capability of the R520 was wrong. ATI apparently has upped the efficiency quite a bit to compete with the 7800GTX.

However like most of us expected, the performance difference isnt terribly large in either direction. Funny how two competitors can seem to match each other with new releases isnt it?
 
Originally posted by: DarkKnight69
Well, I hope that the traffic was well worth the discrediting information they published all over the net.

It was nice having them around, but i dont read reviewers who cannot publish correct information!
Click to expand...

not according to sander: ATI?s X1000 series, an Ouija board outbreak?

"Today my scores are for the most part vindicated, hence I ask you now, who?s been open, honest and frank about this from the get go? But more importantly who continued to play fair game and decided not to join ATI in their game of smear tactics?"
 
... Hardware had the XT being beaten by the GTX in almost all games.

In the reviews, the XT clocked 25MHZ higher beat the GTX OC in terms of performance in more games. (in hard)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top