Lock this Thread.

[Looney]

Well, the Philadelphia Experiment did exist... the government did try to make warships invisible. But did they really warp out and reappear? I think possibly something did go wrong... maybe too much radiation was involved, and some people did burn up and some were exposed to high level of radiations, which could possibly have caused them to go insane. Or maybe the effects were so bad from the radiation (you ever see some of the effects from nuclear detonations? people's shadows actually get burned into buildings), and the crews that saw it couldn't comprehended it properly, and just started rumors. Maybe the ship was invisible for 5 seconds, and the crew didn't know what was going on, so assumed it disappeared... and started such rumors "the ship just disappeared, and when it came back, men were on fire".

 

[littleprince]

I dunno if there are 5 or 4.
If you take my word as credible just cause you read it and you want someting to agree with you, ur a numbskull.
I can vaguely recall the unifying theory, and what it consists of.
I'm pretty sure, gravity, magneitism, i think both for bodies close together like electrons, protons, and for distant objects like planets.
How easily gullible the public is today.
So how bout this for credible source?
Deadtress=numbskulls from a source he says is credible.

 

[Looney]

Originally posted by: Deadtrees

MoralPanic... No, you said 5 energies... there aren't 5... there are 4 forces.

LittlePrince....thought the Unified theory was looking for a way to combine the 5 forces conveniently mathematicaly as they are all very similar. But the constants, equations have not been found yet.

Sorry that I can't translate all those five sources into English. However, I do know that there're five of 'em.
I think LittlePrince has the answer for you.

P.S : What a shame that I even have to QUOTE his words as my answer...

http://homes.aol.com/SOARINDY/GUT081197.html
http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/webprojects1997/GuamTL/section3.htm

You really should read some credible sources... i recommended an excellent book up top to get you started, and it's extremely easy reading.

 

[Looney]

The Elegant Universe

Trust me on this, read this book and you'll have a firm grasp of what GUT is. It's extremely easy to read... i read it years ago, and my knowledge in mathematics and physics is very basic (pretty much all from leisure reading).

 

[Deadtrees]

Originally posted by: littleprince
I dunno if there are 5 or 4.
If you take my word as credible just cause you read it and you want someting to agree with you, ur a numbskull.
I can vaguely recall the unifying theory, and what it consists of.
I'm pretty sure, gravity, magneitism, i think both for bodies close together like electrons, protons, and for distant objects like planets.
How easily gullible the public is today.
So how bout this for credible source?
Deadtress=numbskulls from a source he says is credible.

O.K. Now, I'm a numbskull.
Well, since it's all my fault, what can I say?
Anway, thanks that you didn't go lower than a numbskull..




Anyway, I'm not sure if I'm translating all these words right, but let the numbskull try.

1. gravity
2. electricity
3. magnet
4. nucleus (Strong...The force that grabs this element to the nucleus)
5. nucleus (weak...When nucleus forms itself into other nucleus)

 

[Deadtrees]

Thanks MoralPanic, but all those scientific terms are way too hard for a not-native-english-speaking-barely-came-out-of-the-army-person like me.
Even when I read about this topic in my native language, I have to look up the terms.
I'll see if I can find the book in my country, though.

Thanks!

 

[Looney]

2. electricity
3. magnet

These are the same forces... how else do you think electricity is made?

 

[Iron Woode]

Originally posted by: Deadtrees

Originally posted by: littleprince
I dunno if there are 5 or 4.
If you take my word as credible just cause you read it and you want someting to agree with you, ur a numbskull.
I can vaguely recall the unifying theory, and what it consists of.
I'm pretty sure, gravity, magneitism, i think both for bodies close together like electrons, protons, and for distant objects like planets.
How easily gullible the public is today.
So how bout this for credible source?
Deadtress=numbskulls from a source he says is credible.

O.K. Now, I'm a numbskull.
Well, since it's all my fault, what can I say?
Anway, thanks that you didn't go lower than a numbskull..




Anyway, I'm not sure if I'm translating all these words right, but let the numbskull try.

1. gravity
2. electricity
3. magnet
4. nucleus (Strong...The force that grabs this element to the nucleus)
5. nucleus (weak...When nucleus forms itself into other nucleus)

nucleus? Nuclear. 2 forces: strong and weak.

2. electricity? are you on crack? that is not a force.

There are only 4 forces and 3 have been mathematically linked, but not gravity yet.

As for the Philadelphia Experiment:

some of you guys have been watching too much X-Files. The experiment was to become invisible to radar, not some bloody Romulan cloaking device. Sheeze....

There was not enough power on that ship to do anything near making a magnetic field powerfull enough to effect the space-time continuim. Rampant speculation and hearsay does not make something true. They didn't even have solid state electronics back then. No way to accurately control any high energy experiments.

If your proof is : I read it on several websites and so it must be true, is so lame that words cannot describe the lameness.

This is in the same league as Roswell.

 

[zzzz]

utter BS.

 

[jonmullen]

Good STORY at best, but a story for the camp fire is all it is.

 

[Dingleberries]

I want to believe.