• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lock it up

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Time for the evolving post:

I know the poll is not perfect (there are overlaps and other problems), chose the answer that best suites your beliefs.

Punctuated Equilibrium subscriber here, while I do not believe that the Biogenetic law should be called a law, it does have some grounds in truth as well. I am actually surprised at how often people you talk to sometimes believe in Lamarckian like ideas, I wanted to see how prevalent it was on ATOT.

Most textbooks that I have seen from my local high schools (I have relatives that are instructors) are very dated in regards to the modern synthetic theory.

I am only a junior year biology major undergrad (limits being Genetics 352 and Organic Chem 351 (although not really any biology there)), so go easy on me😱
(1st year CS student, dual major)
 
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: tfinch2
:beer: :lawnchair;

Nef. :|

You're just as guilty. 😉


Maybe it's punctuated equilibrium, maybe it's gradual. I'd say that it's both. Nature likes to try all kinds of things. Some things work well, others don't. Crocodiles and cockroaches seem to be excellent successes.

Concerning your other poll options, now you're using vocabulary I'm not familiar with. 🙂
I'll take Mendelism for $600, Alex.
 
Back
Top