• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

LLC experiences with 3570K on ASRock Z77 Extreme4

Yuriman

Diamond Member
Over the past few days I've been playing with LLC on my ASRock Z77 Extreme4, and I'd like to share my experiences in my own thread.

__________

The idea behind LLC is to reduce vdroop experienced under high load. In theory, this allows you to run a lower offset or additional turbo voltage, which in turn reduces your partial load and/or idle voltages with a fixed "lowest stable" full load voltage. My testing has shown that the implementation of LLC on my particular board is actually counter-productive.

I decided to do my testing at 4.5ghz which draws around 120w under a Linpack load. My configuration is as follows:

offset voltage mode, +.005v
C3/C6/C package states disabled

My settings were otherwise completely stock (or on auto), aside from LLC which was my independent variable, and additional turbo voltage, which is my dependent variable.

One big limitation in my testing is that I have to rely on CPU-Z for voltage measurements.

__________

With LLC set to "auto" or "level 5" which I gather is the "off" setting or at least the lowest LLC, I need a +voltage of approximately +101mv which I have tested to be my minimum stable voltage with 48 hours of Prime small FFT, 48 hours of Prime blend, and 24 hours of IntelBurnTest. At LLC5 and with +101mv, CPU-Z reports that my load voltage can go as low as 1.248v while running IBT, and 1.256v under Prime small FFT. Using Prime blend on 1 thread, my un-drooped voltage is as high as 1.304v.

With that as a baseline, here are my voltages running the various levels of LLC with Prime small FFT with an unchanging +101mv:

LLC lvl5 (least LLC):
1 core Prime blend: 1.304v
4 core Prime sFFT: 1.256v

LLC lvl4:
1c 1.312v
4c 1.280v

LLC lvl3:
1c 1.328v
4c 1.328v

LLC lvl2:
1c 1.336v
4c 1.352v

I didn't test LLC at level 1 because at lvl2 it was already overcompensating for vdroop. This showed me that LLC settings higher than 3 will overcompensate for droop.

__________

Now here's where it gets interesting.

I next tried to lower my voltage with LLC at level 3 to the minimum required for stability. My expectation was that I would be able to get down to, or at least close to 1.248v as reported by CPU-Z, which was my stable 4-core load voltage at LLC5. I found that my lowest stable voltage was at +63mv, which resulted in a 1-core load voltage of 1.296mv and a 4 cores at 1.304mv! Anything lower than that would result in Prime crashing or a BSOD.

Next, I tried the same thing with LLC at lvl4, with similar results. My lowest stable vcore was at +82mv, which resulted in a 1-core voltage of 1.296v and 4 cores at 1.264v.

__________

What I gather is, LLC is actually counter-productive on my board. Enabling it at higher levels only serves to raise my minimum stable load voltage without doing anything to help my idle and low-load voltages.

IDC has had a positive experience with LLC on his Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z though, so I would love some additional data. Would anyone else be willing to experiment with their minimum stable voltages with various levels of LLC?
 
Last edited:
Question , when you run 1 core with prime95 is that starting torture test with 1 in box thread value or you run 4 thread and then close other 3 .
Cause both these give different results, one multitasks other is 100% on 1 core .

On my Ausu P8Z77v pro LLC on auto I get slightly lower voltages running 1 thread value than 4 thread (all cores 100%) by about 0.02v (1.087-1.096 vs 1.120-1.126v )
 
Last edited:
Question , when you run 1 core with prime95 is that starting torture test with 1 in box thread value or you run 4 thread and then close other 3 .
Cause both these give different results, one multitasks other is 100% on 1 core .

On my Ausu P8Z77v pro LLC on auto I get slightly lower voltages running 1 thread value than 4 thread (all cores 100%) by about 0.02v (1.087-1.096 vs 1.120-1.126v )

I wasn't aware of the difference, I was putting "1" in the box.
 
My experience with the Pro4 leads me to believe that Asrock engineers got the LLC settings bass ackwards. 100% had the Vcore jumping up and down like humping hamsters, while 0% was considerably more stable.

Offset OCing also played its part (which is the only option that the Pro4 offers), where the VID would start to drift as the core temp changed.

Sorry, but it's fixed voltage OC + no C-states for me, idle power consumption be damned since I run DC 24/7 anyways 😛
 
I wasn't aware of the difference, I was putting "1" in the box.

yes, if you set anything less than what max cores of cpu, each core will be under loaded (less than 100%) . If you though run, set 4 then close say 3 of core, you will be left with 1 core =100% loaded .

I only know cause I do this as a avg loaded temp reading . I find running 2 threads on my 3570k it close to simulating other apps, like a game as most apps will never be able to run all cores at 100% .

I use Openhardwaremonitor which gives voltages, fan speed, core speed and core loading per core . along with min/max values .like HWMonitor
 
Interesting. I don't think it invalidates the results, but it's good to know.

no it does not ,as I find on this asus MB my less than all 4 cores loaded are more vcore. your seeing opposite condition .
So there seems to be differences in how each MB does power management .
BTW I notice a bigger delta of vcore with less than all cores @100% , I see more up and downs in 1 or 2 thread counts .
 
New to OC'ing these newfangled CPU's, so bear with me.

I have the same mobo & CPU. I'm using all default settings (haven't touched c-states) except - LLC Level 2 and x44 multi.

1.168 - 1.176 vcore (per CPU-Z) during IBT

I haven't done any trial-and-error, since I've been very happy with performance and temps. Is it worth my while to try different LLC levels? I'll probably stick with 4.4, unless there is an efficient way to eek out a little more.
 
Is it worth my while to try different LLC levels?
Yes... but it seems to depend on the board (like CPUs).

I've had 2 of these boards now, in the first LLC1 was useless, and LLC2 was better than LLC3 for stability/voltage.

On the second, LLC1 works well, LLC2 doesn't, and LLC3 works fairly well.

Right now, as far as I have tested (CPU-Z, CoreTemp, etc) LLC has this effect using offset voltages (I don't plan or have any use for fixed).

4.2GHz (C states disabled, PLL disabled, turbo v at auto, SpeedStep & Turbo enabled)

LLC1: +/- 0.008v ... offset: -0.190v ... Idle: 0.712v, Load: 1.096v
LLC2: +/- 0.016v ... offset: -0.165v ... Idle: 0.736v, Load: 1.080v
LLC3: +/- 0.008v ... offset: -0.165v ... Idle: 0.736v, Load: 1.080v
LLC4: +/- 0.024v ... crashed, didn't bother.

LLC 2 and 3 will run at the same offset, but LLC2 fluctuates much more.

LLC1 "seems" like it's using more voltage, however with that rather mild 0.016v change, I get between 2 and 3 degrees (Celsius) cooler at load, and 0.5 to 1 cooler at idle.

It's not significant, especially at 4.2GHz, but assuming it scales the same, would make a pretty big difference at 4.5, or 4.6.

I don't really have any specific stats from the other board, since I fried it... lol (my own fault, nothing to do with the quality or anything)
 
Just got the ASRock Extreme4 and 3570K myself.... Planning on putting this computer together this weekend if I dont end up with more mandatory overtime (Sigh)

Hoping to do a "mild" OC myself to about 4.2-4.4 I'll try to remember to come back here and post what my board does when changing these settings.
 
This doesn't really reflect the differences between LLC settings, but:
Nfa0F.png


Fixed is using/doing whatever it does (set it to Auto, shows up as "1")
Offset is using LLC1, I'll probably do another run through at LLC3...
Don't now if i'll go so far as to do it with each LLC setting.

The only major difference here between stock/default... is PPL Overvolt is disabled, and PLL itself is set to 1.603 (rather than 1.832).
(excluding hardware differences obviously)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top