List the mistakes/wrong choices of...

[cybrsage]

The only person who refuses to look at what I've done in the aggregate and, instead, focuses on one thread... to divert and avoid doing what he doesn't want to do... is you. Everyone else either posted, read the thread and ignored it, or didn't look at the thread at all.

Yet you still refuse to do what you want others to do.

 

[zsdersw]

Yet you still refuse to do what you want others to do.

I've already done what I ask others to do.

 

[cybrsage]

You asked people to post in this thread while not posting in this thread yourself. Seems you did NOT do what you asked others to do. However, I will check the OP to see if you edited it.

EDIT: Nope, you did not.

 

[zsdersw]

You asked people to post in this thread while not posting in this thread yourself. Seems you did NOT do what you asked others to do. However, I will check the OP to see if you edited it.

EDIT: Nope, you did not.

I asked people to post in this thread things they haven't posted in any other: criticisms of both parties instead of just one or the other.

I have posted criticisms of both parties in other threads.

 

[cybrsage]

I asked people to post in this thread things they haven't posted in any other: criticisms of both parties instead of just one or the other.

I have posted criticisms of both parties in other threads.

No, you did not. You very explicitly said:

List the mistakes/wrong choices of...
Republicans and/or groups/persons associated with or closely aligned on policy with Republicans.

Bonus points if you're normally sympathetic toward or supportive of Republicans and you choose to identify their wrong-doings.

-AND-

Democrats and/or groups/persons associated with or closely aligned on policy with Democrats.

Bonus points if you're normally sympathetic toward or supportive of Democrats and you choose to identify their wrong-doings.

No where in there did you say what you just claimed to have said. In fact, you set it up such that people who are not closely aligned with either party should still post, sans bonus points.

 

[zsdersw]

No, you did not. You very explicitly said:

No where in there did you say what you just claimed to have said. In fact, you set it up such that people who are not closely aligned with either party should still post, sans bonus points.

The things I've asked for from others are not present in their posts in other threads. My criticisms of both parties are present in other threads.

If they weren't, more people than just you would be asking for my criticisms of both parties.
If they weren't, less people than the two who have said I'm critical of both parties would have said so.

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally Posted by dmcowen674
Only one thing on Dem side but it a biggie.

Clinton should have never signed NAFTA.

I agree with this 100% and I would go further by saying it was also a HUGE mistake Clinton made by signing the repeal of the Glass-Steigall act.

Oh crap. I didn't realize it was Clinton that signed that too.

The last straw of the downfall of the U.S. did start with Clinton.

Bush just accelerated it.

 

[cybrsage]

The things I've asked for from others are not present in their posts in other threads. My criticisms of both parties are present in other threads.

That was not a requirement in your OP. You very clearly said what I already quoted, above. You request people do something you are unwilling to do yourself.

Show you are willing to do what you want others to do, which is list the mistakes/wrong choices in this thread, since that is what you want others do to but (so far) are unwilling to do yourself. Until then, I cannot take your thread seriously, since it is a "do as I say, not as I do" thread.

 

[zsdersw]

That was not a requirement in your OP. You very clearly said what I already quoted, above. You request people do something you are unwilling to do yourself.

Show you are willing to do what you want others to do, which is list the mistakes/wrong choices in this thread, since that is what you want others do to but (so far) are unwilling to do yourself. Until then, I cannot take your thread seriously, since it is a "do as I say, not as I do" thread.

That would have already happened if I in any way wanted you, specifically, to take the thread seriously. You don't have to take the thread seriously, as far as I'm concerned. You can continue to be a Republican shill for as long as you want to. I, meanwhile, will continue to point it out.

In fact, I think it's good that you won't say anything substantial that is critical of the Republican party in this or any other thread, as it provides me with far more amusement. Those of us like myself who aren't cheerleaders for either party will find it more difficult to believe that your criticisms of Democrats are valid.

People like you who, 99% of the time, never say anything bad about those with whom they always or mostly agree and, instead, only say bad things about those with whom they always or mostly disagree should never be assumed to be relaying the truth.

 

[cybrsage]

That would have already happened if I in any way wanted you, specifically, to take the thread seriously. You don't have to take the thread seriously, as far as I'm concerned.

You have done an outstanding job ensuring it should not be taken seriously. I am surprised that was your goal. Regardless, you succeeded.

 

[zsdersw]

You have done an outstanding job ensuring it should not be taken seriously. I am surprised that was your goal. Regardless, you succeeded.

Others have taken it seriously, which is what's important.

 

[cybrsage]

Others have taken it seriously, which is what's important.

Yes, others have seriously seen that you refuse to do what you want others to do. We both agree.

 

[zsdersw]

Yes, others have seriously seen that you refuse to do what you want others to do. We both agree.

They have? According to what? It doesn't appear that way by the number of people who've posted in the thread and the comments they've made.

You're assuming again.