• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Linus Torvalds: Too many cores = too much BS

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The 2013 Moto X got a lot of crap for having only two cores, even though they were the same cores as were present in the Snapdragon 800 (afaik). Looks like people have changed their tune.
 
Regardless, low number of powerful cores is suitable for TODAY's workloads. Be it 2 or 4, it makes little difference. They are there to support today's iconized UIs and windowed workspaces.

Future UIs may not be equal and software solutions to support them may be different, more or less parallelizable. Saying that two cores are enough for all time is ridiculous, to say the least.

It seems that both Sony and MS have decided that more weaker cores (with more powerful graphics) is suitable for today's console generation. Latest gen handheld flagships pretty much all have 4 cores. Software WILL adapt to resources offered, sooner or later. It doesn't really matter if it's only marketing or something more, they are here to stay and they are what SW guys have to work with.
 
It seems that both Sony and MS have decided that more weaker cores (with more powerful graphics) is suitable for today's console generation.
They also decided that 30FPS is suitable for today's games...
Since the weak cores can't go any higher on demanding games.
 
Back
Top