Lincroft and Pineview: Two different dies

[IntelUser2000]

Pineview:

Lincroft:

 

[21stHermit]

While those are sure pretty, you could help me by giving those names more context. I recognize Pineview as an Atom Pine Trail, as to Lincroft I draw a blank. Sorry too many code names for me to keep track of.

 

[IntelUser2000]

Pineview+Tiger Point = Pinetrail
Lincroft+Langwell = Moorestown

I wonder if they are using different process technologies. Are they both on Intel's 45nm low power SoC process or does it only apply to Lincroft, and Pineview on 45nm HP?

I'm going to go for the latter.

 

[Idontcare]

I wonder if they are using different process technologies. Are they both on Intel's 45nm low power SoC process or does it only apply to Lincroft, and Pineview on 45nm HP?

From a venn diagram perspective, are the layouts identical for otherwise similar function circuits (like the cores or the cache)? If they are the same then they will be the same design rules and sub-node, if they are different dimensions then they will likely be different sub-nodes.

 

[IntelUser2000]

Die sizes

Atom N450/D410: 65.9mm2
Atom D510: 86.6mm2

The die size of the single core is way too similar to the estimated Lincroft's die to speculate on process tech. According to PCWatch's earlier article though, it'll be 70mm2 so larger than Pineview. Which makes it a different process tech? Not really sure. The cell sizes are larger in SoC process so it could be.

TDP

Atom N450: 5.5W
D410: 10W
D510: 13W
NM10 Nettop: 2.1W
NM10 Netbook: 1.5W