bradruth
Lifer
- Aug 9, 2002
- 13,479
- 2
- 81
Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
I'm not really down with your view of "if you shoot you're shooting to kill." It's not that black and white; nothing is. Maybe that's how the law views it, but even if my life is in danger, I'm only going to use as much force as is necessary such that I'm no longer in danger. If that means crippling my adversary rather than capping him in the fvcking head that's what I'll do. But I will use "deadly force" (as you so love to put it) if it's necessary.
Using a firearm is deadly force, no matter where you shoot. That's how it is. A shot to the leg *can* kill a person, but in most instances it won't even neutralize them.
When you shoot someone you are shooting to neutralize the threat. And how do you neutralize a threat? By shooting at 1. center mass and 2. the head. The best-case neutralization is putting two bullets into the heart and one into the brain. Odds are that's not going to happen, no matter how good a shot you think you are. Until you've drawn your weapon on someone and were fully prepared to kill them you simply cannot fathom what it's like.
Bottom line is, you do NOT shoot for limbs. You put your initial rounds into center mass, which is the largest target. After hitting center mass and the target still isn't neutralized you go for the head. If he lives, he lives. If he dies, he dies. The point is your survival and the survival of those around you.
