Originally posted by: SViscusi
Originally posted by: LEDominator
Originally posted by: SViscusi
Originally posted by: zendari
This is what happens when a Democrat strays from the hardline platform.
Originally posted by: LEDominator
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: jpeyton
We don't need lapdogs like Lieberman in the Democratic party. I sincerely hope Lamont wins the primary and sends a message to other lapdog senators.
Who is a lapdog, those who follow party mantra? Lieberman most obviously does not, so perhaps you could clarify that.
Lieberman follows the Republican party mantra.
Proof?
Have either of you bothered to read the entire thread or did you just post so that everyone else can marvel at your ability to see the computer screen with your head up your butt? Both your points, if you can call them that, have been covered.
Indeed I did read every post, and I have yet to see anything I would consider to even be "covered" as proof he isn't a lapdog or he is. No tangible evidence whatsoever other than people throwing out the usual yes he is no he isn't crap.
So what you're telling me is that nowhere have people pointed out positions Joe Lieberman has taken, in opposition to not just the vast majority of his party but also his constituents. You've also must have been living under a rock the past decade when Lieberman has
[*]Led the charge against Bill Clinton and gave credence to the most insane of charges by Republicans at the time.
[*]Undercut Al Gore in the immdeiate aftermath of the 2000 election fiasco
[*]Chastised Democrats for questioning the President during the Iraq War
[*]Was the only Democrat who stood during the Sotu when the president called for privatizing Social Security
Those are only a few.
The fact of the matter is Joe Lieberman is always the first to attack his party, usually using the same rhetoric Republicans use (9/11, traitors, hate america, etc.). He's Zell Miller without the balls to leave the party.