- Jul 27, 2002
- 13,314
- 689
- 126
According to prof. Volokh. In case you're not familiar with him, he is a conservative-leaning 1st amendment scholar and his blog was the mecca of Obamacare opponents during the litigation.
http://www.volokh.com/2012/11/19/li...uals-and-supporters-of-military-dictatorship/
Moreover, this phenomenon extends to the justices at the high court;
http://www.volokh.com/2012/11/19/ar...-justices-more-likely-to-protect-hate-speech/
It's one reason why I am at unease to call myself conservative and have reservations on Citizens United.
http://www.volokh.com/2012/11/19/li...uals-and-supporters-of-military-dictatorship/
The pattern is the same: Liberals are somewhat more likely than conservatives to support protection for the speech, though the gulf isnt very wide, and there are divides within each group. And this is so even though theres no reason to think the liberals are likely to sympathize more with the pro-military-dictatorship message, or even view as my extremists, who should be free to speak even if I dont agree with them. I dont think that either conservatives or liberals would view these people as their sort of extremists; though conservatives seem to have a higher opinion of the military than liberals do (also judging by a GSS question), I dont sense any affinity either on the Left or on the Right for military dictatorship.
Moreover, this phenomenon extends to the justices at the high court;
http://www.volokh.com/2012/11/19/ar...-justices-more-likely-to-protect-hate-speech/
The bottom line result seems to be much the same as what I described for the public at large liberals are somewhat more likely than conservatives to support protection for what is sometimes labeled hate speech, though the gulf isnt vast, and theres a substantial split of opinion on both sides. The same also remains even if we exclude Hudnut (which had to do with sex, and which might be hard to categorize for reasons I mention below) and even if we exclude both Hudnut and Collin (perhaps in trying to limit ourselves to post-1990 cases, to reflect the possibility that both conservative and liberal views on free speech have shifted in recent decades). Indeed, even excluding Hudnut and Collin, the result in terms of total votes shows 75% pro-hate-speech-protection for the liberals, 50% for the moderates, and 67% for the conservatives. If you rearrange some of the categories, the results might change slightly; but on balance, I think this probably captures the situation pretty well.
It's one reason why I am at unease to call myself conservative and have reservations on Citizens United.