LGBTQ - When Did This Become Acceptable? [NSFW]

[s0me0nesmind1]

Somewhere between equality, and marriage disputes we definitely fell off the wagon. When Did this become acceptable actions? Or are people simply too scared to question this level of stupidity?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1414523107709267973

Reporting on it:

WATCH: Library brings in 'rainbow dildo butt monkey' to teach children about literacy

The library apologized, but a promo for the event clearly showed a grown adult in a rainbow monkey costume with a swinging phallus between their legs.

thepostmillennial.com

Lets have drag people read to children! What could go wrong? Well, besides the fact that there have been multiple instances of these being registered child sex offenders. No biggie when it comes to children lol. If you're against this then you're just ignorant.

Houston Public Library admits registered child sex offender read to kids in Drag Queen Storytime

A media spokesperson for the library confirmed one of those drag queens, Tatiana Mala Nina, is Alberto Garza, a 32-year-old child sex offender.

www.khou.com

Needless to say, the indoctrination is running rampant. So I have to ask the question - why does the left find this acceptable? And why do you choose this hill to die on?

I'm not saying this behavior is unacceptable - I'm saying it's unacceptable in a public library - or anything from a government function (school, etc.). But for some reason people want to attempt to normalize this with children, which the child sex offenders GREATLY appreciate your ignorance of. I find it to be just like sex, alcohol, etc... Feel free to have your drag parlors, prostitution, swingers clubs, etc... As long as it's in adult places for adults. Crazy concept, I know.

‘Insane’ VIDEO of children being paraded and tipped at DRAG SHOW causes uproar

Footage from a drag show in Los Angeles is causing uproar on social media as it shows children posing for the crowd and being tipped cash.

www.rt.com

 

[MrSquished]

Somewhere between equality, and marriage disputes we definitely fell off the wagon. When Did this become acceptable actions? Or are people simply too scared to question this level of stupidity?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1414523107709267973

Reporting on it:

WATCH: Library brings in 'rainbow dildo butt monkey' to teach children about literacy

The library apologized, but a promo for the event clearly showed a grown adult in a rainbow monkey costume with a swinging phallus between their legs.

thepostmillennial.com

Lets have drag people read to children! What could go wrong? Well, besides the fact that there have been multiple instances of these being registered child sex offenders. No biggie when it comes to children lol. If you're against this then you're just ignorant.

Houston Public Library admits registered child sex offender read to kids in Drag Queen Storytime

A media spokesperson for the library confirmed one of those drag queens, Tatiana Mala Nina, is Alberto Garza, a 32-year-old child sex offender.

www.khou.com

Needless to say, the indoctrination is running rampant. So I have to ask the question - why does the left find this acceptable? And why do you choose this hill to die on?

I'm not saying this behavior is unacceptable - I'm saying it's unacceptable in a public library - or anything from a government function (school, etc.). But for some reason people want to attempt to normalize this with children, which the child sex offenders GREATLY appreciate your ignorance of. I find it to be just like sex, alcohol, etc... Feel free to have your drag parlors, prostitution, swingers clubs, etc... As long as it's in adult places for adults. Crazy concept, I know.

‘Insane’ VIDEO of children being paraded and tipped at DRAG SHOW causes uproar

Footage from a drag show in Los Angeles is causing uproar on social media as it shows children posing for the crowd and being tipped cash.

www.rt.com

I don't want sex offenders being part of children's events, nor do I want a president who is a serial sex offender either.

So you have a really micro example of something, and then you have a cult of 70 million people who think a sexual assaulter is fine to be president.

It's a joke. You have zero moral standing. You are the party of cockroaches.

 

[IronWing]

So I have to ask the question - why does the left find this acceptable?

The "left" finding this acceptable not found. Now, why do you find treason and fascism acceptable?

 

[HomerJS]

OP could care less about sexual predators so why are his panties in a bunch now? Have one of those weekends?

 

[woolfe9998]

First anecdote has nothing to do with LGBT AFAIK. Someone apparently didn't look closely enough before hiring that company for the event. What it has to do with any of your political points is beyond me. Stupid people are stupid. It's an amusing story, though. I'll give you that.

Then there's this bit of bigoted BS:

Lets have drag people read to children! What could go wrong? Well, besides the fact that there have been multiple instances of these being registered child sex offenders. No biggie when it comes to children lol. If you're against this then you're just ignorant.

Let's get this straight. So a registered sex offender is hired to read to children, and your observation is that "transgendered people are sex offenders" not that everyone hired to interact with children should be checked for registry status first, regardless of gender identity?

Seriously dude, knock off the twitter anecdotes. Twitter is not news, and anecdotes are not evidence.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

Let's get this straight. So a registered sex offender is hired to read to children, and your observation is that "transgendered people are sex offenders" not that everyone hired to interact with children should be checked for registry status first, regardless of gender identity?

Seriously dude, knock off the twitter anecdotes. Twitter is not news, and anecdotes are not evidence.

Where did I say or indicate "transgendered people are sex offenders"? No where. The answer is... no where. It's your own bigotry inserting things in there that don't exist.

My simple philosophy is that no one should be doing anything in front of children that relates to anything sex-related. Crazy concept, I know.

 

[ivwshane]

Lets have drag people read to children! What could go wrong? Well, besides the fact that there have been multiple instances of these being registered child sex offenders. No biggie when it comes to children lol. If you're against this then you're just ignorant.

Who said that?

 

[woolfe9998]

Where did I say or indicate "transgendered people are sex offenders"? No where. The answer is... no where. It's your own bigotry inserting things in there that don't exist.

What you said is this:

Lets have drag people read to children! What could go wrong? Well, besides the fact that there have been multiple instances of these being registered child sex offenders. No biggie when it comes to children lol. If you're against this then you're just ignorant.

So first off you said plainly that it's a bad idea to have trans people read to children. Your reason: that some trans people have turned out to be "registered sex offenders." You did not draw the obvious conclusion: that everyone working with children should be checked on the registry first, no. Instead, your conclusion is to not have trans people read to children. So you're saying that being trans means you're more likely to molest children. And to make matters worse, you've drawn that conclusion based on anecdotes, not data.

Frankly, I can't think of anything more obviously bigoted you could have said. Look, these specific black people are thieves. Therefore, you should not allow black people anywhere near your stuff. There is literally zero difference between that and your reasoning in the passage above.

My simple philosophy is that no one should be doing anything in front of children that relates to anything sex-related. Crazy concept, I know.

Why does just being transgender mean you are exposing the kids to something "sexual?"

 

[MrSquished]

Where did I say or indicate "transgendered people are sex offenders"? No where. The answer is... no where. It's your own bigotry inserting things in there that don't exist.

My simple philosophy is that no one should be doing anything in front of children that relates to anything sex-related. Crazy concept, I know.

Your cult leader is a serial sexual assaulter and a disgusting role model, by being a pig and doing shit like making fun of the disabled, so spare us the crocodile tears. Your party is the party of scum from the top down.

Oh wait. You are a pig and probably think sexual assault on women is funny, based on your posts here.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

So first off you said plainly that it's a bad idea to have trans people read to children. Your reason: that some trans people have turned out to be "registered sex offenders." You did not draw the obvious conclusion: that everyone working with children should be checked on the registry first, no. Instead, your conclusion is to not have trans people read to children. So you're saying that being trans means you're more likely to molest children. And to make matters worse, you've drawn that conclusion based on anecdotes, not data.

Frankly, I can't think of anything more obviously bigoted you could have said. Look, these specific black people are thieves. Therefore, you should not allow black people anywhere near your stuff. There is literally zero difference between that and your reasoning in the passage above.

Why does just being transgender mean you are exposing the kids to something "sexual?"

The word trans is LITERALLY not in any of those sentences lol. Not in any little bit. The whole post was in relation to "Drag children reading" where one of the readers was a child sex offender. The clear indication is that having something like drag is something that is very sexually related - it's very revealing - it's very "sex friendly". Which like I said - is perfectly fine in the context of sexual things (strip clubs, swingers clubs, bars, etc...)..

The only thing bigotted is you inserting the word trans into sentencing that it isn't actually in. You're insinuating and inserting it in there, not me.

 

[Greenman]

Back when my kids were young, that would have pushed me over the edge.

 

[woolfe9998]

The word trans is LITERALLY not in any of those sentences lol. Not in any little bit. The whole post was in relation to "Drag children reading" where one of the readers was a child sex offender. The clear indication is that having something like drag is something that is very sexually related - it's very revealing - it's very "sex friendly". Which like I said - is perfectly fine in the context of sexual things (strip clubs, swingers clubs, bars, etc...)..

The only thing bigotted is you inserting the word trans into sentencing that it isn't actually in. You're insinuating and inserting it in there, not me.

LOL nice attempt at a save. People who go in public in drag are nearly always trans, so everyone knows exactly what and who you meant. Non-trans cross dressing - typically done by straight men - IS a sexual thing, and it's done in private, like J. Edgar Hoover did. If someone is in drag because they are trans, it's not sexual.

Also, the "LGBTQ" is right there in your subject line. This entire thread as you conceived it was supposed to be about LGBTQ. Since you now claim you were never referring to trans, which part of your story relates to that at all?

 

[Amol S.]

Your cult leader is a serial sexual assaulter and a disgusting role model, by being a pig and doing shit like making fun of the disabled, so spare us the crocodile tears. Your party is the party of scum from the top down.

Oh wait. You are a pig and probably think sexual assault on women is funny, based on your posts here.

You do realize your response usually does not work with conservatives. I am not being a devils advocate here, but what i can say is that every time I read on a comment board someone posting a reply like you have, a conservative typically responded by saying "At least it was women who were adults that Trump went after, not kids whom Anthony Wiener sexted. "

You typically must have response that can't be refuted by a negative pointing of someone in the Democratic Party doing something similar but in a more awful manner. When you typically do that, it leads to conservatives like @s0me0nesmind1 ending up stumped, as they can't find an answer that supports the Republican Party.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

LOL nice attempt at a save. People who go in public in drag are nearly always trans, so everyone knows exactly what and who you meant. Non-trans cross dressing - typically done by straight men - IS a sexual thing, and it's done in private, like J. Edgar Hoover did. If someone is in drag because they are trans, it's not sexual.

Also, the "LGBTQ" is right there in your subject line. This entire thread as you conceived it was supposed to be about LGBTQ. Since you now claim you were never referring to trans, which part of your story relates to that at all?

Nice attempt at a save? The word literally isn't present in those quoted sentences - nor could any logical human imply that it was lol. C'mon don't bring yourself down to their level of stupid.

 

[woolfe9998]

You do realize your response usually does not work with conservatives. I am not being a devils advocate here, but what i can say is that every time I read on a comment board someone posting a reply like you have, a conservative typically responded by saying "At least it was women who were adults that Trump went after, not kids whom Anthony Wiener sexted. "

You typically must have response that can't be refuted by a negative pointing of someone in the Democratic Party doing something similar but in a more awful manner. When you typically do that, it leads to conservatives like @s0me0nesmind1 ending up stumped, as they can't find an answer that supports the Republican Party.

You think it's worse to send a picture of your dick to a 15 year than to physically assault an adult woman? I don't know. I'm not so sure.

 

[woolfe9998]

Nice attempt at a save? The word literally isn't present in those quoted sentences - nor could any logical human imply that it was lol. C'mon don't bring yourself down to their level of stupid.

Let's try a different approach here. What part of your OP had to do with "LGBTQ" which is the first thing in your subject line?

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

Let's try a different approach here. What part of your OP had to do with "LGBTQ" which is the first thing in your subject line?

Drag is unquestionably in the realm of "LGBT" that continues to have ever-expending letters to their acronym. Your association of it with the T portion is in particular wrong.

Drag queen

A drag queen is a man who dresses, and often acts, like a caricature woman often for the purpose of entertaining. There are many kinds of drag artists and they vary greatly, from professionals who have starred in films to people who just try it once. Drag queens also vary by class and culture...

lgbt.wikia.org

 

[MrSquished]

You do realize your response usually does not work with conservatives. I am not being a devils advocate here, but what i can say is that every time I read on a comment board someone posting a reply like you have, a conservative typically responded by saying "At least it was women who were adults that Trump went after, not kids whom Anthony Wiener sexted. "

You typically must have response that can't be refuted by a negative pointing of someone in the Democratic Party doing something similar but in a more awful manner. When you typically do that, it leads to conservatives like @s0me0nesmind1 ending up stumped, as they can't find an answer that supports the Republican Party.

I stated earlier I don't support any type of sex offender teaching kids, micro level or not. And contrasted it to the view of the GQP that they actually worship these kinds of people as their great leaders on a macro level.

 

[woolfe9998]

Drag is unquestionably in the realm of "LGBT" that continues to have ever-expending letters to their acronym. Your association of it with the T portion is in particular wrong.

Drag queen

A drag queen is a man who dresses, and often acts, like a caricature woman often for the purpose of entertaining. There are many kinds of drag artists and they vary greatly, from professionals who have starred in films to people who just try it once. Drag queens also vary by class and culture...

lgbt.wikia.org

So let's get this straight. It isn't trans people who are more likely to be child molesters, it's just "men in drag" who are, and these "men in drag" are somewhere in the LGBTQ spectrum? LOL

 

[UNCjigga]

I’m just waiting for OP’s thread raging against Apple’s upcoming Pregnant Man Emoji and how it’s just another sign of libtards leading society to inevitable collapse and doom. Won’t someone think of the children!!!

 

[cytg111]

BzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

RUSSIA TODAY ????

Good job comrade moron.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

So let's get this straight. It isn't trans people who are more likely to be child molesters, it's just "men in drag" who are, and these "men in drag" are somewhere in the LGBTQ spectrum? LOL

It's people who believe their sexuality relates to children reading.

No one goes to a children's book reading and asks to declare the sexuality of the reader... mostly because.... *gasp*... no one caaaaaaaaares.

 

[cytg111]

How much of this #fakenews can ATPN afford?

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

How much of this #fakenews can ATPN afford?

real pictures are SOOOOOOOOOOOO offensive!

Why use facts when you can use your feelings instead?

 

[1prophet]

Somewhere between equality, and marriage disputes we definitely fell off the wagon. When Did this become acceptable actions? Or are people simply too scared to question this level of stupidity?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1414523107709267973

Reporting on it:

WATCH: Library brings in 'rainbow dildo butt monkey' to teach children about literacy

The library apologized, but a promo for the event clearly showed a grown adult in a rainbow monkey costume with a swinging phallus between their legs.

thepostmillennial.com

Lets have drag people read to children! What could go wrong? Well, besides the fact that there have been multiple instances of these being registered child sex offenders. No biggie when it comes to children lol. If you're against this then you're just ignorant.

Houston Public Library admits registered child sex offender read to kids in Drag Queen Storytime

A media spokesperson for the library confirmed one of those drag queens, Tatiana Mala Nina, is Alberto Garza, a 32-year-old child sex offender.

www.khou.com

Needless to say, the indoctrination is running rampant. So I have to ask the question - why does the left find this acceptable? And why do you choose this hill to die on?

I'm not saying this behavior is unacceptable - I'm saying it's unacceptable in a public library - or anything from a government function (school, etc.). But for some reason people want to attempt to normalize this with children, which the child sex offenders GREATLY appreciate your ignorance of. I find it to be just like sex, alcohol, etc... Feel free to have your drag parlors, prostitution, swingers clubs, etc... As long as it's in adult places for adults. Crazy concept, I know.

‘Insane’ VIDEO of children being paraded and tipped at DRAG SHOW causes uproar

Footage from a drag show in Los Angeles is causing uproar on social media as it shows children posing for the crowd and being tipped cash.

www.rt.com

What, you just realized the camel whose nose you ignored for decades has entered the tent, body and all?

Before you know it you will have an up your alley/Folsom street festival in every community and cry about how the country has fallen while pointing fingers at democrat/liberals who have been indoctrinated to find this behavior acceptable just like republicans find exploiting those beneath them for profit acceptable.

Tell you a little secret, if republican conservatives paid attention and participated in their local elections, schoolboards and local community in general regularly for the last 40 years like they do to 2/4 year elections and single issue voting instead of consistently chasing profit or the next shiny thing that came their way because their corporate masters told them that is their function in life, there would be no rainbow monkeys or drag queens in your libraries or schools today as well as many other things you see tearing the country apart today.

The deviants in society didn't force their way into your children's schools, you just left the door open for them to do so because you were too busy chasing the almighty dollar and neglecting the country that gave you the opportunity to make all that money.