Originally posted by: Gibsons
Originally posted by: ed21x
current treatments seem to hold leukemia pretty well in control for a cousin of mine who never had to do chemo. He's on a pilot progtram, where he had to take a small handful of pills after every meal. Sem to live a pretty normal life. Chemotherapy is something that should be avoided at all cost, as it effectively destroys everything... your body's immune system, bone marrow, liver, etc... in addition to what you're trying to control. In the long run, i believe it does more harm than good.
What were these pills your cousin was taking, and how were they not chemotherapy?
For the OP, don't get your medical advice from ATOT, see above as to why.
There are many different kinds of leukemia, some worse than others. Sometimes the age at which you get it seems to play a role in how aggressive the disease is, e.g. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia is usually not so aggressive in the elderly, but in the (extremely rare) cases of childhood CLL it's much more aggressive.
There are some leukemias for which there are very effective chemotherapies these days - in most cases it's still better to catch the disease as early as possible of course.
edit: to the OP; my degree is in leukemia research - PM me if you feel like it. I'm a research guy, though, not a clinician.