• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

let's take a trip down the memory lane... :)

Memory lane is the present for me as my current system is running off of a Pentium M 1.6, 768MB DDR 333, and Geforce FX 5200. Before I had issues with the fan and overheating on my laptop I could run CS:S and HL2 comfortably @ 800x600 on DX8 with low settings (~25-50 FPS), but it won't handle older games such as Return to Castle Wolfenstein, Morrowind, etc... (I didn't bother testing many others). Sometimes the gameplay in ancient games like Homeworld is not even smooth (below 30-40fps at times).. I'll only have to put up with this for a few weeks as I'll soon be upgrading to Quad-core and 8800GTX. =)
 
I believe my FX5200 is also the 32mb version running on AGP 4x. -_- Before 2004 I was using a Pentium II 233, 96mb SDRAM, and Nvidia Riva 128 (I think) that was purchased for $2000 in '94 or '95. I remember trying to run the original UT @ 320x200 (whatever the lowest resolution was offered) and it wouldn't play with a constant frame rate or even hardware accelerated 3d effects. It was a pretty dismal age for gaming. =( Let's leave it at that.
 
I created this a long, long time ago...

R9250 v. FX5200

Remember that being a DX9.0 compliant GPU actually HURTS the FX5200 because its DX9 performance was so bad. Might as well not even use the DX9.0 rendering paths at all.
 
Are those benchmarks accurate? I swear I can't even play RTCW on my system at playable frames no matter what the settings are.
 
Back
Top