lets nationalize a few refineries

mizzou

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2008
9,734
54
91
*gets into devils advocate character*

What if the u.s. purhased and ran a few off line refineries for gasoline? We could call its products "U.S. Gas"

The crude purchased for refinement could be bought off the market at price or brought in from surpluss reserves, and then refined and sold to dealers at a set price with set profit margins ensuring operating costs are covered and minimal profit which could be spent however, maybe R&D or new infrastrucure for alternatives.

Also, only a few stations selling only u.s. gas could be open in each city, keeping local price competition in check but not over run with government business. Especially because supplies have to be limited due to the small amount of refinement capacity.

This would #1 increase competition, #2 help stimulate the economy since no new infrastructre is really necessary other then buying old stations and renovating them, #3 is minimally intrusive to the private sector....so long as the gas sold does not cease to be profitable. #4 how about paying off that big debt in the meantime.....

I dont see how opec or other producing nations would be too opposed because oil is sti bought at market price. And also it would be a good gauge for regular americans what the real cost at the pump should be.

Moat industries are already so comptetitive that the us couldnt possibly get anywhere competiting, but it seems so silly easy to make a quick buck in oil refinement for gas and it makes sense for ciizens.


This of course is assuming oil refining is where we are making very good profit margins in the grand scheme of things
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,365
9,569
136
Government owned means of production.

First time their little oil company can't compete, they'll have an automatic tax payer bailout allowing abnormal practices that would put their competition out of business.

Gets pretty expensive after that.
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Government owned means of production.

First time their little oil company can't compete, they'll have an automatic tax payer bailout allowing abnormal practices that would put their competition out of business.

Gets pretty expensive after that.

Yes, government will be able to charge us whatever they want, and that's different from the current situation of private collusion and socialization of losses somehow.
 

mizzou

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2008
9,734
54
91
Government owned means of production.

First time their little oil company can't compete, they'll have an automatic tax payer bailout allowing abnormal practices that would put their competition out of business.

Gets pretty expensive after that.

It seems like a pretty easy sell in my opinion, you dont have to advertise it. Except for maybe warning people if their business get too proftable and burden citizens then comrade sam will come looking for yoi.>=)

J/k

But anyway, i find it difficult to NOT make profit in this manner. It would only be possible if it was self sustaining and only reaped minimal profit.

I dont see the complications other then of course ideological ones
 

a777pilot

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2011
4,261
21
81
Good idea! Within but a few years we would have the genious of Fammie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Post Office, and let's not forget AmTrack.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
So are the operators and maintenance staff going to be unionized government workers? Private unionized workers? Or maybe unskilled people paid minimum wage to perform the work?
 

mizzou

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2008
9,734
54
91
So are the operators and maintenance staff going to be unionized government workers? Private unionized workers? Or maybe unskilled people paid minimum wage to perform the work?

no need to unionize workers, theres plenty of candidaes around qualified enough to be a refinery worker. Not all gov employees are unionized. I have no clue what non manual labor people do, it seems like any other factory in the industry

Obviously im not all for it but it seems like a quick way to drop a buck or two off gasoline.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
no need to unionize workers, theres plenty of candidaes around qualified enough to be a refinery worker. Not all gov employees are unionized. I have no clue what non manual labor people do, it seems like any other factory in the industry

Obviously im not all for it but it seems like a quick way to drop a buck or two off gasoline.

The majority of a cost of gasoline is in the cost of crude oil. How would a govt run refinery take 25-50% off a gasoline without subsidizing it? And in the process destroying market mechanics? Subsidizing means we pay for it on the back end while fucking up the demand curve, making the problem worse.
 

mizzou

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2008
9,734
54
91
The majority of a cost of gasoline is in the cost of crude oil. How would a govt run refinery take 25-50% off a gasoline without subsidizing it? And in the process destroying market mechanics? Subsidizing means we pay for it on the back end while fucking up the demand curve, making the problem worse.

idea is based solely on that refineries are popping huge profits. Govnt refinery would operate on same principle, just not rape on profits. I specifically omitted subsidation as something that would not work.


Like i said, i have no realistic view other than armchair about profits on their end. Ive heard both per barrell and refined products make heavy profits.


If it turns out that nobody is making giant profts than this is a worthless venture.


Ex. We are geting f'ed with 20-40% profit margins on a commodity, gov steps in and makes 10% profit making the whole process more comptetitive
 

mizzou

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2008
9,734
54
91
How much margin are the refineries getting?

Depends on when they make their purhase, im assuming recently you can hold onto oil when bought cheaply and then sell the refined product at a higher market price when commodity prices rise.

I.e., im refining $90 barrell month old to gas but selling the final product to stations as if its the current $110 barrell

Edit: maybe youd have to nationalize an oil rig as well, uhoh :)
 
Last edited:

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
idea is based solely on that refineries are popping huge profits. Govnt refinery would operate on same principle, just not rape on profits. I specifically omitted subsidation as something that would not work.


Like i said, i have no realistic view other than armchair about profits on their end. Ive heard both per barrell and refined products make heavy profits.


If it turns out that nobody is making giant profts than this is a worthless venture.


Ex. We are geting f'ed with 20-40% profit margins on a commodity, gov steps in and makes 10% profit making the whole process more comptetitive

Where are you getting 20-40% profit?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Depends on when they make their purhase, im assuming recently you can hold onto oil when bought cheaply and then sell the refined product at a higher market price when commodity prices rise.

I.e., im refining $90 barrell month old to gas but selling the final product to stations as if its the current $110 barrell

Sure but what are you doing with that 110\barrel price? I suspect these refineries are selling their product as fast as they can refine it.
 

mizzou

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2008
9,734
54
91
Where are you getting 20-40% profit?

Its an example under which this would make sense. Obviously if they really do only have like a 5% profit margin, having the gov offer a smaller competitor that operates at 2.5% profit will not do enough o lower prices.

Just throwing that out there for discussion. Playing devils advocate.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
What is the oil reserve that the refinery has.
Days, not weeks/months.

They refine the product as soon as possible - for them to store it is a waste of resources and $$.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Good idea! Within but a few years we would have the genious of Fammie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Post Office, and let's not forget AmTrack.

not to mention winning World War 2.

oh wait, guess that doesn't fit your skew.
 

mizzou

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2008
9,734
54
91
What does WWII have to do with govt taking over private industry in an attempt to reduce prices?

This thread is not about any govt takeover, its about a miniscule govt venture into selling gasoline , trying to heat up some competition away from record profits at our economies expense
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Isn't the margin on gas very small anyway? If the government really wanted to save you money they'd take over apple and it's 30&#37; profit margin. But then douchy libtards wouldn't be able to surf on Their iPad all day.