Let's hear it for the French . . .

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Good job, Froggies. Way to fumble up a sting operation . . .

AP

One U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the U.S. government had been trying to keep the negotiations with France confidential, "hoping that we would be able to lure some of these people in."

The official said there was some frustration within the Department of Homeland Security that the flights were canceled, thus allowing the word to get out about the security concerns.



 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Those jerks; they made it so they can't even attempt to catch a potential threat.

Honestly, if there was a big enough threat; would you really risk peoples' lives on the possibilty you could catch the person(s)?
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Originally posted by: Strk
Those jerks; they made it so they can't even attempt to catch a potential threat.

Honestly, if there was a big enough threat; would you really risk peoples' lives on the possibilty you could catch the person(s)?

I imagine they were wanting to arrest the suspected people before they entered the plane, in as quiet a fashion as possible. I don't think they would have allowed them to take off.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: Strk
Those jerks; they made it so they can't even attempt to catch a potential threat.

Honestly, if there was a big enough threat; would you really risk peoples' lives on the possibilty you could catch the person(s)?

I imagine they were wanting to arrest the suspected people before they entered the plane, in as quiet a fashion as possible. I don't think they would have allowed them to take off.

I'm aware they wanted to try and catch whoever they suspected; but where is the guarantee they would have?(that is if the threat is real) Why risk hundreds of lives on an assumption that you will get everyone?
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
If France had shrugged off the US embassy's request to cancel the flights and another terrorist attack had occurred, I wonder what kinds of thread titles we would have here in P&N.
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: Strk
Those jerks; they made it so they can't even attempt to catch a potential threat.

Honestly, if there was a big enough threat; would you really risk peoples' lives on the possibilty you could catch the person(s)?

I imagine they were wanting to arrest the suspected people before they entered the plane, in as quiet a fashion as possible. I don't think they would have allowed them to take off.

I'm aware they wanted to try and catch whoever they suspected; but where is the guarantee they would have?(that is if the threat is real) Why risk hundreds of lives on an assumption that you will get everyone?

What is the danger if the flights never leave the ground? Do you honestly think that they would risk that? No, they'd have dozens of police personnel in the airplane disguised as travelers and flight attendents and arrest their suspects before the plane even backed away from the terminal.

The French government is either very stupid or deliberately undermining American efforts. Whatever the case may be we missed a golden opportunity to capture one or several terrorist cells relatively intact, as well as whatever hard intelligence that might have gone along with it.
 

JackStorm

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2003
1,216
1
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
If France had shrugged off the US embassy's request to cancel the flights and another terrorist attack had occurred, I wonder what kinds of thread titles we would have here in P&N.

French bashing to be sure. They're damned if that do, and damned if they don't(gee, where have I heard this before? :p )

Edit: Here's a title I'm sure we would have been seeing (or something similar) if something had happend "French allow terrorists slip by to bomb the U.S"
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
The value of labeling sixty million people is????

What exactly does that have to do with the thread? Just curious. You seem to have an agenda not consistent with the discussion.

On topic, this is an interesting story developing. Apparently the intelligence was quite specific, flight numbers and dates. It would be unfortunate if the French botched things.


Oh OK, the label remark makes sense now (froggies....). Sorry. My bad.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: arsbanned
The value of labeling sixty million people is????

What exactly does that have to do with the thread? Just curious. You seem to have an agenda not consistent with the discussion.

On topic, this is an interesting story developing. Apparently the intelligence was quite specific, flight numbers and dates. It would be unfortunate if the French botched things.

The author of the thread called the French a bunch of frogs when the decision was made by the PM. I don't see any agenda, I see a person who doesn't like to accuse an entire nation because of the action of the PM.(and before you say "but the people chose the PM", the PM is appointed, not elected.)
 

Ronstang

Lifer
Jul 8, 2000
12,493
18
81
Originally posted by: Gaard
If France had shrugged off the US embassy's request to cancel the flights and another terrorist attack had occurred, I wonder what kinds of thread titles we would have here in P&N.
France had no choice. If they refused, then the planes would have been denied ascces to US airspace and thus their only fate would be to fall into the ocean upon running out of fuel or being shot down by the US Air Force. Either way France would be at fault.

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,817
6,778
126
I salute the French by eating their cheese. Oh man, you know there's something wrong with people that can make that good of cheese.
 

rickn

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
7,064
0
0
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Gaard
If France had shrugged off the US embassy's request to cancel the flights and another terrorist attack had occurred, I wonder what kinds of thread titles we would have here in P&N.
France had no choice. If they refused, then the planes would have been denied ascces to US airspace and thus their only fate would be to fall into the ocean upon running out of fuel or being shot down by the US Air Force. Either way France would be at fault.

right, that would be a real coup for America, when probably most of the passengers were Americans anyway
rolleye.gif
 

Ronstang

Lifer
Jul 8, 2000
12,493
18
81
Originally posted by: rickn
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Gaard
If France had shrugged off the US embassy's request to cancel the flights and another terrorist attack had occurred, I wonder what kinds of thread titles we would have here in P&N.
France had no choice. If they refused, then the planes would have been denied ascces to US airspace and thus their only fate would be to fall into the ocean upon running out of fuel or being shot down by the US Air Force. Either way France would be at fault.

right, that would be a real coup for America, when probably most of the passengers were Americans anyway
rolleye.gif
Never said it would be a coup, I said France had no choice as the potential outcomes would be their fault dumbass.
 

Genesys

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2003
1,536
0
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
The value of labeling sixty million people is????

and the value to ponting out others shortcomings? you realize that people will always call others they disagree with names. dems will always call repubs names and vice versa, Americans will always call other 'inferior' nationalities names an vice versa. It happens when one harbors ill will against another.

In other words, get over it cause it'll always happen.

Besides, there is plenty of value if labeling 60 million people. When all you see are the people that represent a populace and they fit the stereotype, one cant help but extend the stereotype to all the people being represented.
 

rickn

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
7,064
0
0
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: rickn
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Gaard
If France had shrugged off the US embassy's request to cancel the flights and another terrorist attack had occurred, I wonder what kinds of thread titles we would have here in P&N.
France had no choice. If they refused, then the planes would have been denied ascces to US airspace and thus their only fate would be to fall into the ocean upon running out of fuel or being shot down by the US Air Force. Either way France would be at fault.

right, that would be a real coup for America, when probably most of the passengers were Americans anyway
rolleye.gif
Never said it would be a coup, I said France had no choice as the potential outcomes would be their fault dumbass.

lets cut your brain in half and count the stupidity rings.
 

Witling

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2003
1,448
0
0
For what it's worth, Al Jazeera is reporting that the French aircraft warnings were a false alarm. They say the French police examined the names of the passengers and came up with no terrorists. This story

Before ranting and raving, this story appeared late Christmas day. Why not wait to see if a reputable western source picks up the story and then rant and rave.
 

gaga38

Member
Apr 15, 2003
33
0
0
Originally posted by: Strk
Those jerks; they made it so they can't even attempt to catch a potential threat.

Honestly, if there was a big enough threat; would you really risk peoples' lives on the possibilty you could catch the person(s)?


lol
french pm wanted to board 6 armed gign (sort of counter terrorist agency) by plane and told it to powell who refused at once because he didnt want to risk any terrorist attack
check your sources.



 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
X-man

do some research before you start with the French bashing

The US intelligence was wrong (again)

The French did pick up several people that were on the US made list to question them (one American, one French and several Algerians)





BBC link
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,817
6,778
126
Originally posted by: Genesys
Originally posted by: dahunan
The value of labeling sixty million people is????

and the value to ponting out others shortcomings? you realize that people will always call others they disagree with names. dems will always call repubs names and vice versa, Americans will always call other 'inferior' nationalities names an vice versa. It happens when one harbors ill will against another.

In other words, get over it cause it'll always happen.

Besides, there is plenty of value if labeling 60 million people. When all you see are the people that represent a populace and they fit the stereotype, one cant help but extend the stereotype to all the people being represented.
Good grief, Genesys, you got the bigotry package down pat huh. All them assumptions you make about people is just you projecting onto others how you are. The world stinks cause you gots yur nose im yur ass, so to speak. I happens ta know yur really an angle what got gragged through the mud. A little bath and yu'll be fine.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
The world stinks cause you gots yur nose im yur ass,

ewwwwwwww.

:D

The Las Vegas angle is pretty interesting though. How about a quick poll to see who would be upset if they took out Las Vegas? ;)
 

smashp

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2003
2,443
0
0
""A French Interior Ministry spokesman said nine people booked on Air France's canceled Christmas Eve flight AF 068 had been questioned and released without being charged. Four were U.S. nationals, two German, one Algerian, one French and one Belgian, the spokesman said. ""




 

Genesys

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2003
1,536
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Genesys
Originally posted by: dahunan
The value of labeling sixty million people is????

and the value to ponting out others shortcomings? you realize that people will always call others they disagree with names. dems will always call repubs names and vice versa, Americans will always call other 'inferior' nationalities names an vice versa. It happens when one harbors ill will against another.

In other words, get over it cause it'll always happen.

Besides, there is plenty of value if labeling 60 million people. When all you see are the people that represent a populace and they fit the stereotype, one cant help but extend the stereotype to all the people being represented.
Good grief, Genesys, you got the bigotry package down pat huh. All them assumptions you make about people is just you projecting onto others how you are. The world stinks cause you gots yur nose im yur ass, so to speak. I happens ta know yur really an angle what got gragged through the mud. A little bath and yu'll be fine.

ever hear the phrase 'guilt by association'?