Originally posted by: OFFascist
That would work, except that your speed is written down, and he'll have likely "refreshed" before any trial. Coke is irrelivant, since the speed you were doing was previously recorded.Originally posted by: ViRGE
Good plan huh?
Thats not the point though, the point is that it might put some doubt in the minds of the jury.[/quote]
My god! This is traffic court. There is no jury.
A jury and courts + lawyers, .... is just not remotely worth the effort and cost when dealing with little traffic infringements. A lawyer?s fee alone would most likely be higher than the ticket. Also, if your record is fairly clean, a judge will rarely ever assign points and raise a person's insurance.
Edit: (didn't read every post before writing...) Well, I guess I'm wrong. If you can have a jury, disregard what I just said.
I still think a jury is overkill for traffic offenses. Being out a bit of money doesn't seem worth all the time and effort it takes to fight the charge, gather a jury, hold trials.........
