I was wondering if a person would be treated differently in the court of law considering these two scenarios:
- A guy is walking down the street with a baseball bat. He notices someone is "looking at him funny." So he walks up to the person and beat the sh*t out of that person.
- A guy comes home from work and sees his 17 y.o. girlfriend crying. After a short conversation, he finds out that someone at her work attempted to rape her. Luckily she got away with only mental damage. In rage, the guy grabs a baseball bat and goes on the search of the scumbag. Once found, that piece of sh*t is severely beaten.
What would be the consequences for the attacker in the 2nd scenario compared to the 1st?
Disregard race and ethnicity.
- A guy is walking down the street with a baseball bat. He notices someone is "looking at him funny." So he walks up to the person and beat the sh*t out of that person.
- A guy comes home from work and sees his 17 y.o. girlfriend crying. After a short conversation, he finds out that someone at her work attempted to rape her. Luckily she got away with only mental damage. In rage, the guy grabs a baseball bat and goes on the search of the scumbag. Once found, that piece of sh*t is severely beaten.
What would be the consequences for the attacker in the 2nd scenario compared to the 1st?
Disregard race and ethnicity.
