• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Legal Age of Consent (NJ)

necine

Diamond Member
Okay, so my interpretation of this law is that the age of consent is basically 16 or 4 years. However, a friend of mine just told me a 30 year old got indicted for sleepign with a 16 year old.

THE LAW

On the left click statues, and search "Actor" LOOK FOR "2C:14-2 Sexual assault"

What is the Age of Consent in NJ?

2C:14-2 Sexual assault.

2C:14-2. Sexual assault. a. An actor is guilty of aggravated sexual assault if he commits an act of sexual penetration with another person under any one of the following circumstances:

(1)The victim is less than 13 years old;

(2)The victim is at least 13 but less than 16 years old; and

(a)The actor is related to the victim by blood or affinity to the third degree, or

(b)The actor has supervisory or disciplinary power over the victim by virtue of the actor's legal, professional, or occupational status, or

(c)The actor is a resource family parent, a guardian, or stands in loco parentis within the household;

(3)The act is committed during the commission, or attempted commission, whether alone or with one or more other persons, of robbery, kidnapping, homicide, aggravated assault on another, burglary, arson or criminal escape;

(4)The actor is armed with a weapon or any object fashioned in such a manner as to lead the victim to reasonably believe it to be a weapon and threatens by word or gesture to use the weapon or object;

(5)The actor is aided or abetted by one or more other persons and the actor uses physical force or coercion;

(6)The actor uses physical force or coercion and severe personal injury is sustained by the victim;

(7)The victim is one whom the actor knew or should have known was physically helpless, mentally defective or mentally incapacitated.

Aggravated sexual assault is a crime of the first degree.

b.An actor is guilty of sexual assault if he commits an act of sexual contact with a victim who is less than 13 years old and the actor is at least four years older than the victim.

c.An actor is guilty of sexual assault if he commits an act of sexual penetration with another person under any one of the following circumstances:

(1)The actor uses physical force or coercion, but the victim does not sustain severe personal injury;

(2)The victim is on probation or parole, or is detained in a hospital, prison or other institution and the actor has supervisory or disciplinary power over the victim by virtue of the actor's legal, professional or occupational status;

(3)The victim is at least 16 but less than 18 years old and:

(a)The actor is related to the victim by blood or affinity to the third degree; or

(b)The actor has supervisory or disciplinary power of any nature or in any capacity over the victim; or

(c)The actor is a resource family parent, a guardian, or stands in loco parentis within the household;

(4)The victim is at least 13 but less than 16 years old and the actor is at least four years older than the victim.

Sexual assault is a crime of the second degree.

Amended 1979, c.178, s.26; 1983, c.249, s.2; 1989, c.228, s.3; 1997, c.194, s.1; 2001, c.60; 2004, c.130, s.13.

2C:14-2.1. Victim of sexual assault may consult with prosecutor on plea negotiations
1.Whenever there is a prosecution for a violation of N.J.S.A.2C:14-2, the victim of the sexual assault shall be provided an opportunity to consult with the prosecuting authority prior to the conclusion of any plea negotiations.

Nothing contained herein shall be construed to alter or limit the authority or discretion of the prosecutor to enter into any plea agreement which the prosecutor deems appropriate.

L.2003,c.137.

2C:14-3 Aggravated criminal sexual contact; criminal sexual contact
a. An actor is guilty of aggravated criminal sexual contact if he commits an act of sexual contact with the victim under any of the circumstances set forth in 2C:14-2a. (2) through(7).

Aggravated criminal sexual contact is a crime of the third degree.

b. An actor is guilty of criminal sexual contact if he commits an act of sexual contact with the victim under any of the circumstances set forth in section 2C:14-2c. (1) through(4).

Criminal sexual contact is a crime of the fourth degree.

Amended 1979, c.178, s.27; 1997, c.194, s.2.

EDIT: This is to win a bet. My GF is 20, and I'm 21 in 14 days.
 
In Georgia a few months ago, where the age of consent is definately 16 and there is a stipulation where if the minor is 14 or 15 and the other party is 3 or fewer years older then it's a misdemeanor, a 17 yr old got a 10 year felony child molestation sentence for getting a bj from a 15 yr old. So they find ways around the laws because the laws are not always complete.
 
(3)The victim is at least 16 but less than 18 years old and:

(a)The actor is related to the victim by blood or affinity to the third degree; or

(b)The actor has supervisory or disciplinary power of any nature or in any capacity over the victim; or

(c)The actor is a resource family parent, a guardian, or stands in loco parentis within the household;

Seems like that fits the description here.
 
Originally posted by: thraashman
In Georgia a few months ago, where the age of consent is definately 16 and there is a stipulation where if the minor is 14 or 15 and the other party is 3 or fewer years older then it's a misdemeanor, a 17 yr old got a 10 year felony child molestation sentence for getting a bj from a 15 yr old. So they find ways around the laws because the laws are not always complete.

It's because he was black and the girl was white. Effe that.
 
Basically what it appears is that in NJ if they're under 16 it's aggravated sexual assault and if they're between 16 and 18 it's just sexual assault and it falls under one of the listed stipulations. Was the 30 year old a teacher or employer perhaps?
 
Originally posted by: thraashman
Basically what it appears is that in NJ if they're under 16 it's aggravated sexual assault and if they're between 16 and 18 it's just sexual assault IF it falls under one of the listed stipulations. Was the 30 year old a teacher or employer perhaps?

BTW, Fixed.

That's what I was thinking... That has to be the case.
 
Originally posted by: necine
Originally posted by: thraashman
In Georgia a few months ago, where the age of consent is definately 16 and there is a stipulation where if the minor is 14 or 15 and the other party is 3 or fewer years older then it's a misdemeanor, a 17 yr old got a 10 year felony child molestation sentence for getting a bj from a 15 yr old. So they find ways around the laws because the laws are not always complete.

It's because he was black and the girl was white. Effe that.

Technically he was convicted properly under the letter of the law. It's the law that was f-ed up. While the statutory rape statute has a stipulation about 14 or 15, the child molestation statute does not. They're supposedly changing the law because of his conviction.

And I don't agree with him being convicted, but the jury in the case had no choice if they were following the law. I think the prosecutor pushed it too far and the law needs to be rewritten.
 
Any 30 year old has "authority" or "supervision" over someone 16 years old. Just because they are an adult, mostly.

At least thats what I gather.
 
Originally posted by: thraashman
Originally posted by: necine
Originally posted by: thraashman
In Georgia a few months ago, where the age of consent is definately 16 and there is a stipulation where if the minor is 14 or 15 and the other party is 3 or fewer years older then it's a misdemeanor, a 17 yr old got a 10 year felony child molestation sentence for getting a bj from a 15 yr old. So they find ways around the laws because the laws are not always complete.

It's because he was black and the girl was white. Effe that.

Technically he was convicted properly under the letter of the law. It's the law that was f-ed up. While the statutory rape statute has a stipulation about 14 or 15, the child molestation statute does not. They're supposedly changing the law because of his conviction.

And I don't agree with him being convicted, but the jury in the case had no choice if they were following the law. I think the prosecutor pushed it too far and the law needs to be rewritten.


IMHO, they wouldn't have convicted the kid if he was white. That's just my opinion though. I'm against any law that could be used disproportionately against blacks or other minorities.
 
Originally posted by: necine
Originally posted by: thraashman
Originally posted by: necine
Originally posted by: thraashman
In Georgia a few months ago, where the age of consent is definately 16 and there is a stipulation where if the minor is 14 or 15 and the other party is 3 or fewer years older then it's a misdemeanor, a 17 yr old got a 10 year felony child molestation sentence for getting a bj from a 15 yr old. So they find ways around the laws because the laws are not always complete.

It's because he was black and the girl was white. Effe that.

Technically he was convicted properly under the letter of the law. It's the law that was f-ed up. While the statutory rape statute has a stipulation about 14 or 15, the child molestation statute does not. They're supposedly changing the law because of his conviction.

And I don't agree with him being convicted, but the jury in the case had no choice if they were following the law. I think the prosecutor pushed it too far and the law needs to be rewritten.


IMHO, they wouldn't have convicted the kid if he was white. That's just my opinion though. I'm against any law that could be used disproportionately against blacks or other minorities.

Better get rid of most laws then.
 
Back
Top