Leaked Biden Audio admits he won't do anything - Shows he is Trump 2.0

[s0me0nesmind1]

I'm shocked and appalled.

I particularly liked the first part where he is asked what will he do - and that people aren't seeing any progress or results anywhere. What does he answer with? Basically gives a full-on Trump 2.0 answer "I've already done so much, fuck you, I've done more so far than anyone else has ever done!"

Just wow - if you watch Trump and say "What an asshat" you could literally take the words from Biden here - and without knowing ahead of time the source you would think to yourself "Oh, is this a Trump speech?"

 

[Amused]

That's not what he said.

Biden told civil rights leaders in private meeting that progressives' hopes for executive actions are 'way beyond the bounds' of his presidential authority
https://www.cnn.com/profiles/eric-bradner

Updated 4:54 PM ET, Thu December 10, 2020

Biden told civil rights leaders in private meeting that progressives' hopes for executive actions are 'way beyond the bounds' of his presidential authority

President-elect Joe Biden expressed skepticism about his powers to implement his agenda by executive action Tuesday in a private virtual meeting with civil rights leaders, according to a recording reported Thursday by The Intercept.

www.cnn.com

 

[hal2kilo]

I'm shocked and appalled.

I particularly liked the first part where he is asked what will he do - and that people aren't seeing any progress or results anywhere. What does he answer with? Basically gives a full-on Trump 2.0 answer "I've already done so much, fuck you, I've done more so far than anyone else has ever done!"

Just wow - if you watch Trump and say "What an asshat" you could literally take the words from Biden here - and without knowing ahead of time the source you would think to yourself "Oh, is this a Trump speech?"

Context? Sure he sounds just like Trump.

Have a few more drinks ass.

 

[MrSquished]

I guess n0b0dy ran out of swastika shaped foam pieces to fire out of nerf guns for fun at Anne Frank memorials made out of legos, so now he has to shitpost out of context bullshit.

 

[zzyzxroad]

Can anyone guess who said this ? Trump or Biden? Impossible to tell right?

"I am not going to violate the Constitution. Executive authority that my progressive friends talk about is way beyond the bounds"

 

[Jhhnn]

Can anyone guess who said this ? Trump or Biden? Impossible to tell right?

"I am not going to violate the Constitution. Executive authority that my progressive friends talk about is way beyond the bounds"

I'd think an honest conservative would feel relieved hearing Joe say that. Those are rare people these days.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

I'm a conservative and i believe it when Biden said" He has the most extensive and inclusive vote fraud organization in history" AND he proved it !

 

[Amused]

The ultimate punchline to this failed thread is @s0me0nesmind1 acting like they are genuinely concerned about legislative action on civil rights

 

[MrSquished]

That's not what he said.

Biden told civil rights leaders in private meeting that progressives' hopes for executive actions are 'way beyond the bounds' of his presidential authority
https://www.cnn.com/profiles/eric-bradner

Updated 4:54 PM ET, Thu December 10, 2020

Biden told civil rights leaders in private meeting that progressives' hopes for executive actions are 'way beyond the bounds' of his presidential authority

President-elect Joe Biden expressed skepticism about his powers to implement his agenda by executive action Tuesday in a private virtual meeting with civil rights leaders, according to a recording reported Thursday by The Intercept.

www.cnn.com

I appreciate what Biden had to say there and I think he is right.

 

[nickqt]

I'm shocked and appalled.

I particularly liked the first part where he is asked what will he do - and that people aren't seeing any progress or results anywhere. What does he answer with? Basically gives a full-on Trump 2.0 answer "I've already done so much, fuck you, I've done more so far than anyone else has ever done!"

Just wow - if you watch Trump and say "What an asshat" you could literally take the words from Biden here - and without knowing ahead of time the source you would think to yourself "Oh, is this a Trump speech?"

Hey look!

It's n0b0dy!

And he's here to scream hysterically into a mirror and call it a fucking moron before scampering away to continue being a fucking moron elsewhere.

Bye n0b0dy!

 

[MooseNSquirrel]

I'm a conservative and i believe it when Biden said" He has the most extensive and inclusive vote fraud organization in history" AND he proved it !

You most certainly are not a conservative. Conservatives respect the democratic process. ReTrumplicans think a vote for Biden is fraudulent. No proof needed.

 

[zzyzxroad]

I'd think an honest conservative would feel relieved hearing Joe say that. Those are rare people these days.

Might even classify them as endangered.

 

[Zorba]

The ultimate punchline to this failed thread is @s0me0nesmind1 acting like they are genuinely concerned about legislative action on civil rights

While at the same time arguing the Holocaust and covid restrictions are the same plain of evil in another thread.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

You most certainly are not a conservative. Conservatives respect the democratic process. ReTrumplicans think a vote for Biden is fraudulent. No proof needed.

Too many irregularities and too much witnessed fraud, but nice try.

 

[mect]

The OP is swinging for the fences of stupidity today. How on earth does returning to respectful norms and working within the constitutional restrictions of the presidency equate to Trump 2.0? This speech was about as Anti-Trump as it gets. Did the OP even listen to it.

As for Krystal Ball, she makes some good points sometimes, and is generally in support of good legislation and causes, but she is overly dramatic, not the most honest in her portrayal of events (something she endlessly accuses the MSM of), and tends to attack the establishment just for the sake of the attack regardless of whether or not there is merit.

 

[Amused]

Too many irregularities and too much witnessed fraud, but nice try.

And yet zero irregularities and zero evidence of widespread fraud proved in any court... after 50+ cases.

You're being duped and you sound like a pathetic parrot.

 

[mect]

And yet zero irregularities and zero evidence of widespread fraud proved in any court... after 50+ cases.

You're being duped and you sound like a pathetic parrot.

Nonsense, its obviously just that all these Republican Secretaries of State and Trump appointed judges are in on fraud.

 

[MrSquished]

And yet zero irregularities and zero evidence of widespread fraud proved in any court... after 50+ cases.

You're being duped and you sound like a pathetic parrot.

He's not duped. Corrupt.

 

[nakedfrog]

And yet zero irregularities and zero evidence of widespread fraud proved in any court... after 50+ cases.

You're being duped and you sound like a pathetic parrot.

All those darn liberal activist judges that were appointed by the Trump admin, I tell ya...

 

[Meghan54]

Too many irregularities and too much witnessed fraud, but nice try.

Then why, upon questioning by the PA court, did Guiliani deny fraud was at the center of their lawsuits in PA?

And when Brann pressed Giuliani to explain why none of the specific legal claims in the suit are based on voter fraud, the president’s lawyer admitted the campaign isn’t pleading voter fraud at all. Later, Brann asked whether he should apply a higher legal standard of “strict scrutiny” to the case, which is required when fraud is alleged.

“If we had alleged fraud, then yes, but this is not a fraud case,” Giuliani said quickly.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

 

[MrSquished]

The OP is swinging for the fences of stupidity today. How on earth does returning to respectful norms and working within the constitutional restrictions of the presidency equate to Trump 2.0? This speech was about as Anti-Trump as it gets. Did the OP even listen to it.

Every day is homerun day for that guy.

 

[DaaQ]

Too many irregularities and too much witnessed fraud, but nice try.

So you want to clip the video, to remove context, then claim to accept what was said on face value, all the while making excuses for the other guy who is inexplicitly, NOT taken out of context, whilst not accepting that at face value, and excusing it as well he said this but meant this.

GOT IT.

 

[ewdotson]

Too many irregularities and too much witnessed fraud, but nice try.

You mean "Too many irregularities and too much witness fraud", right? Because that accurately represents the farcical court cases Trump lawyers have brought.

 

[Meghan54]

Too many irregularities and too much witnessed fraud, but nice try.

Then why does court after court, even courts headed by recent Trump appointees, keep dismissing Trump's lawsuits? Why do judges, incl. Trump appointed judges, continually excoriate Trump's lawyers and lawsuits that have absolutely no facts presented within. And, no, statements aren't facts, as has been pointed out to you repeatedly by posters here and by judges in numerous courtrooms.

 

[pmv]

And yet zero irregularities and zero evidence of widespread fraud proved in any court... after 50+ cases.

You're being duped and you sound like a pathetic parrot.

He's duped because he wants to be duped. He needs to believe it was all a massive, incredibly-elaborate, fraud (that for some reason, nobody has ever pulled-off before in the entire history of the US) because the alternative is that...ulp...his guy lost. And for him (and too many Republican voters) the latter is just inconceivable.