- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,571
- 10,207
- 126
I have two rigs. One is a C2D, with a Radeon X1950Pro. One is a NV6150-based onboard video. The first rig has a Westinghouse LCM-22w3, and the other has a Samsung 205BW. Both are connected via analog VGA.
Both are nearly razor-sharp.
But I had the need to swap the C2D with another rig for testing, and this other rig had a BFG 6600GT OC OEM card, using the DVI-I to VGA adaptor.
Loading the newest NV WHQL drivers, and the picture is, well, slightly fuzzy. Hard to describe, but not exactly razor sharp anymore. Still at native 1680x1050 resolution.
So when people claim that analog VGA isn't as sharp as DVI, it may well be dependent on your card's output, and not on the monitor itself.
I had always heard that ATI had better analog VGA quality, but now I'm a believer.
Both are nearly razor-sharp.
But I had the need to swap the C2D with another rig for testing, and this other rig had a BFG 6600GT OC OEM card, using the DVI-I to VGA adaptor.
Loading the newest NV WHQL drivers, and the picture is, well, slightly fuzzy. Hard to describe, but not exactly razor sharp anymore. Still at native 1680x1050 resolution.
So when people claim that analog VGA isn't as sharp as DVI, it may well be dependent on your card's output, and not on the monitor itself.
I had always heard that ATI had better analog VGA quality, but now I'm a believer.