spacetoilet
Junior Member
I wanted to ask you guys about this since allot of people post allot of garbage when it comes to LCD's and CRT's and gaming.
Now I started gaming way back and I still play Q3 Arena (ancient I know)
But the very first thing I noticed when finally switching to CRT was screen tearing. Now some people claim that it does not matter past 60hz as you cant tell the difference with the human eye. But I can tell you that is horsesh**t.
Just try a game at 60 (quake live foe example) and then put it on 125fps play it.
Anyway, are we doomed in this modern age of PC gaming to only have 60fps in games?
Even though allot of our rigs can run a game at 60 all the way to the 100s of fps? Most games these days I use vertical sync, which as I understand it locks the fps at 60 so as to stay in time withn the crappy crt 60hz refresh. And that tearing is caused when the monitor cant keep up with the gfx card?
Is there any LCD's that have 125hz? *(true 125hz, not interpolation) Or are we doomed to 60 fps for ever more?🙁
Now I started gaming way back and I still play Q3 Arena (ancient I know)
But the very first thing I noticed when finally switching to CRT was screen tearing. Now some people claim that it does not matter past 60hz as you cant tell the difference with the human eye. But I can tell you that is horsesh**t.
Just try a game at 60 (quake live foe example) and then put it on 125fps play it.
Anyway, are we doomed in this modern age of PC gaming to only have 60fps in games?
Even though allot of our rigs can run a game at 60 all the way to the 100s of fps? Most games these days I use vertical sync, which as I understand it locks the fps at 60 so as to stay in time withn the crappy crt 60hz refresh. And that tearing is caused when the monitor cant keep up with the gfx card?
Is there any LCD's that have 125hz? *(true 125hz, not interpolation) Or are we doomed to 60 fps for ever more?🙁