Lauren Bobert advocates behavior that interferes with airline flights.

[HomerJS]

You can slice this anyway you try. She is advocating anarchy on airline flights. This is your modern day Republican Party. Crime is cool unless perps are brown people. Chaos, insurrection.

I get so tired of right wing defenders calling #bothsides on bad/traitorus behavior. There is nobody on the left comparable to Lauren Bobert, MTG, Louie Gohmert (I can name 6 others). The rot this country faces comes 95% from the right. In case you can't do math that isn;t #bothsides.

Rep. Lauren Boebert Lists What Patriots Should Be Willing To Do And... It’s Something

The extremist lawmaker's airplane advice, in particular, drew criticism.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Jaskalas]

There is nobody on the left comparable

There are, but they are not being elevated to Congress and leadership positions the same way crazy and dangerous is being championed among Republicans.

 

[UNCjigga]

Notice how right wing media has stopped posting every little thing AOC does as some kind of crazy-eyed unhinged Latina madness??? Yeah, they know their shit stinks worse.

 

[hal2kilo]

Notice how right wing media has stopped posting every little thing AOC does as some kind of crazy-eyed unhinged Latina madness??? Yeah, they know their shit stinks worse.

It's all crime, immigrants, and fentanyl in that world, right now. Fox is staggering at the moment like a fighter on a 10 count.

 

[sdifox]

What is the problem? They'll just be added to the no fly list.

 

[Pens1566]

I'd say "she's the worst", but that would only be temporary until the next time MTG/Gaetz/Cruz/Jordan/Gosar/Santos/Paul/Hawley/etc. do something newsworthy.

 

[MtnMan]

She advocates bad behavior on airplanes. Airlines can put her on their "no fly" list, and they should.

 

[HomerJS]

There are, but they are not being elevated to Congress and leadership positions the same way crazy and dangerous is being championed among Republicans.

Name one person on the left comparable to MTG

 

[iRONic]

It's all crime, immigrants, and fentanyl in that world, right now. Fox is staggering at the moment like a fighter on a 10 count.

Your first sentence just described every Republican primary advertisement in Kentucky.

 

[Moonbeam]

It's fun watching the Republican Party die.

 

[Bacstar]

It's fun watching the Republican Party die.

I decided to re-register as an Independent from Republican a couple years ago... wonder how many have done the same?

 

[MrSquished]

The Republican party are literally terrorists. Whether It's brushing off a violent insurrection or down playing the threat of white nationalist domestic terrorism, or terrorizing the freedom of women and girls and forcing them to be baby carriers, or economic terrorists how they're holding the economy hostage like they never do for a republican president. They are also Christo fascist terrorists trying to force their fucked up interpretation of christianity on to everybody.

You look at the last 100 years of history of any country that has had a horrific political movement that's oppressive and nationalist do horrific things via a political movement to its population, and today's Republican party is exactly that. And that is the end goal of Republican power. A horrific as any fascist or totalitarian or authoritarian nationalist movement of the past 100 years, They are one and the same

 

[Moonbeam]

I decided to re-register as an Independent from Republican a couple years ago... wonder how many have done the same?

Hopefully all the ones with a functioning conscience.

 

[nickqt]

The Republican party are literally terrorists. Whether It's brushing off a violent insurrection or down playing the threat of white nationalist domestic terrorism, or terrorizing the freedom of women and girls and forcing them to be baby carriers, or economic terrorists how they're holding the economy hostage like they never do for a republican president. They are also Christo fascist terrorists trying to force their fucked up interpretation of christianity on to everybody.

You look at the last 100 years of history of any country that has had a horrific political movement that's oppressive and nationalist do horrific things via a political movement to its population, and today's Republican party is exactly that. And that is the end goal of Republican power. A horrific as any fascist or totalitarian or authoritarian nationalist movement of the past 100 years, They are one and the same

Nationalist Christians practice Nationalist Christianism.

Nat-Cs practice Nat-C'ism.

Same shit, slightly different tag names.

There are no arguments to be had with fascists. They only understand power.

 

[A///]

This is the same woman whose 17 year old son thought with his dick and knocked up a then 15 yo girl.

 

[nickqt]

This is the same woman whose 17 year old son thought with his dick and knocked up a then 15 yo girl.

To be fair this is probably the only reason our species exists. If only responsible adults had children, there'd have been very few children over the past million years or so.

This is also why you're going to see Republicans reject prohibiting child marriage and reject raising age of consent laws... while also screaming about a possible trans kid that might be lurking in their very own state, somewhere.

If a Republican or their ally can't have sex with a (female) child and force that (female) child to then birth that potential Republican child, there'd be a whole lot less Republicans.

It's an extension of white (Republican) replacement theory.

Every accusation is a confession, ad nauseam, forever, with fascists.

 

[A///]

To be fair this is probably the only reason our species exists. If only responsible adults had children, there'd have been very few children over the past million years or so.

This is also why you're going to see Republicans reject prohibiting child marriage and reject raising age of consent laws... while also screaming about a possible trans kid that might be lurking in their very own state, somewhere.

If a Republican or their ally can't have sex with a (female) child and force that (female) child to then birth that potential Republican child, there'd be a whole lot less Republicans.

It's an extension of white (Republican) replacement theory.

Every accusation is a confession, ad nauseam, forever, with fascists.

You've got it wrong mate, she praised rural teen births, of age or otherwise.

Boebert praises high rural teen birth rates while announcing first grandchild

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) is announcing that she’ll soon be “a 36-year-old grandmother,” while praising “rural conservative communities” that “value life.” The Colorado Republican revealed that…

thehill.com

 

[nickqt]

You've got it wrong mate, she praised rural teen births, of age or otherwise.

Boebert praises high rural teen birth rates while announcing first grandchild

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) is announcing that she’ll soon be “a 36-year-old grandmother,” while praising “rural conservative communities” that “value life.” The Colorado Republican revealed that…

thehill.com

Did you miss the part in my post where I specifically said Republicans oppose making it harder for children to make new children?

 

[A///]

Did you miss the part in my post where I specifically said Republicans oppose making it harder for children to make new children?

The post had no merit. Age of consent won't stop teens from having sex. Do you remember what it was like to be a teenager? Child marriage are republicans fetishistic their inner pedophilia. the latter is an adult marrying a child. guess what, parental permission and a court order has allows two people under 18 to get married in the past! still legal fyi.

republicans only care about adding to the birth rate as long as it's a white child. they couldn't give a fuck if it's a minority or whatever happens to the child after.

 

[nickqt]

The post had no merit. Age of consent won't stop teens from having sex. Do you remember what it was like to be a teenager? Child marriage are republicans fetishistic their inner pedophilia. the latter is an adult marrying a child. guess what, parental permission and a court order has allows two people under 18 to get married in the past! still legal fyi.

republicans only care about adding to the birth rate as long as it's a white child. they couldn't give a fuck if it's a minority or whatever happens to the child after.

So you're repeating what I said in my post that you quoted, which you say has no merit.

Got it.

 

[A///]

So you're repeating what I said in my post that you quoted, which you say has no merit.

Got it.

Not at all. You posted your own twisted theory. Republicans want white babies. Whether that kid is Liberal or conservative later in life it doesn't matter, as long as it outpaces the birth of minorities.

I'm not sure why you brought up Republicans having sex with children resulting in babies. Almost ever Republican caught has been with another male, legal or underage. The latter of which adds to their hypocrisy of the gays endangering kids which was projection, which I'll credit you with. The type of pervert republicans like Roy Moore are very rare.

It wasn't long ago we were all questioning Gaetz's "son" relationship. If all the minorities in the Democratic party bowed out tomorrow and started their own third string party that barely made waves, you'd see Republicans working with Democrats without today's issues. Republicans see minorities in the Republican party as useful idiots. For republicans it's always been about race, not ideology.

 

[nickqt]

Not at all. You posted your own twisted theory.

What in my argument is "twisted"? Please, elaborate.

Republicans want white babies. Whether that kid is Liberal or conservative later in life it doesn't matter, as long as it outpaces the birth of minorities.

In my "twisted" argument, I said: If a Republican or their ally can't have sex with a (female) child and force that (female) child to then birth that potential Republican child, there'd be a whole lot less Republicans.

It's an extension of white (Republican) replacement theory.

I'm not sure how that's any different. And, I even snuck in some "pro-life" (forced birth) stuff there, that's how adroit I can sometimes be at observing objective reality.

I'm not sure why you brought up Republicans having sex with children resulting in babies. Almost ever Republican caught has been with another male, legal or underage.

First, most Republicans aren't gay nor have "most" been "caught" with other males. You're confusing scandals that get reported by the press with the actual amount of secret sexual relations that adults have with children.

Second, it's relevant to everything I just said. And, it's relevant to the very thing YOU just said...that they want more white babies.

Again, either you didn't read what I wrote, or saw what I wrote and decided that you were going to slam dunk against it by...repeating what I said. Either way I'm confused by your continued attempt to say I'm wrong or that my argument is "twisted".

The latter of which adds to their hypocrisy of the gays endangering kids which was projection, which I'll credit you with. The type of pervert republicans like Roy Moore are very rare.

Here you can see the agreement. Yet, you fall back on the misguided belief that most/more Republicans are secretly gay and only "perverted in that way" than straight white Republicans who are perverts. I'm not sure why you believe that, except as some meme belief that only Republicans are secretly gay and perverted "in that way".

It wasn't long ago we were all questioning Gaetz's "son" relationship. If all the minorities in the Democratic party bowed out tomorrow and started their own third string party that barely made waves, you'd see Republicans working with Democrats without today's issues. Republicans see minorities in the Republican party as useful idiots. For republicans it's always been about race, not ideology.

Sure, and I'll quote myself, again: If a Republican or their ally can't have sex with a (female) child and force that (female) child to then birth that potential Republican child, there'd be a whole lot less Republicans.

It's an extension of white (Republican) replacement theory.

So, the only disagreement I see is that you believe more Republicans are secretly gay "perverted" and not "straight white male" perverted, which I'll definitely disagree with you on, as just counting the number of scandals involving secretly gay Republican "perverts" isn't the same as counting all instances of straight white male "perverts" that are out there right now.

AND, the reason why those straight white male perverts aren't "scandalous" and reported upon is EXACTLY BECAUSE Republicans and their allies will tolerate straight white male perversion and the creation of new white Republicans because it fits within the conservative framework.

AND...that very framework is explicitly shown...by the rejection by Republicans of child marriage laws and age of consent laws...which I said in my first reply to you.

I assure you, there is nothing "twisted" in my argument. I responded to you that there shouldn't be any surprise, at all, that Boebert is OK with her child knocking up another child to create a third child. Over and over again, Republicans publicly reject laws that would hamper the ability of Republicans and their allies from having as many white Republican children as possible. This is all in my first reply.

I'd love to see what you consider "twisted" in my initial reply, but otherwise I'm done with this particular branch because I can't really highlight how you aren't disagreeing with me on anything of substance any more than I already have.

 

[Jaskalas]

Name one person on the left comparable to MTG

I don't even know the depths of her depravity. Makes comparisons difficult.
Moreover, I ALREADY said they are not elevated to Congress. AKA, I directly said they do not compare.
Do you not hear?

And yes, I can assure you that not everyone who votes D is a sweet little angel. Not that you can refute such a basic concept, but I sure as hell am not going to go bring some random twat into this. It is beside the point. You having a bone to pick is a distraction from me agreeing with you.

 

[HomerJS]

I don't even know the depths of her depravity. Makes comparisons difficult.
Moreover, I ALREADY said they are not elevated to Congress. AKA, I directly said they do not compare.
Do you not hear?

And yes, I can assure you that not everyone who votes D is a sweet little angel. Not that you can refute such a basic concept, but I sure as hell am not going to go bring some random twat into this. It is beside the point. You having a bone to pick is a distraction from me agreeing with you.

You can't #bothsides deplorable by expanding the sample size of the left. Not a fair comparison. Any one person can be despicable but the Republican Party has it down to a science.

The sample size are members of Congress or state legislators depending on the subject.

 

[Homerboy]

She advocates bad behavior on airplanes. Airlines can put her on their "no fly" list, and they should.

Maybe this is how we get some meaningful train infrastructure built in this country?