• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Laser based mosquito zapper

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Lasers + killing + mosquitoes = fun
And it was built from parts off of ebay. I want one !

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/using-lasers-to-zap-mosquitoes/
Nathan Myhrvold, Microsoft’s former chief technology officer, thinks so. His company, Intellectual Ventures, has assembled commonly available technology — parts used in printers, digital cameras and projectors — to make rapid lasers to shoot down mosquitoes in mid-flight. If bed nets are the low-tech solution to combat the deadly disease — caused by a parasite transmitted when certain mosquitoes bite people — the laser is a high-tech one.

He gave the first public demonstration of the laser, which was cobbled together from parts found on eBay, at the annual TED conference in Long Beach, Calif., which features lectures and demonstrations by experts in a wide range of fields, including technology, politics and entertainment.

After hundreds of mosquitoes (which were kept in the hotel bathroom until showtime) were released into a glass tank, a laser tracked their movements and slowly shot them down, leaving their carcasses scattered on the bottom of the tank. While the demonstration was slowed down for public viewing, Mr. Myhrvold said that normally the lasers could shoot down anywhere between 50 to 100 mosquitoes per second.

Mr. Myhrvold played a slow-motion recorded video that showed what happened to a representative mosquito. As the insect flew, a sudden light beam struck it, disintegrating parts of its body into a plume of smoke. It fell, even as its wings continued to beat.

Mr. Myhrvold said the software detects the speed and size of the image before deciding whether to shoot. It would reject a butterfly or a human, for example, and more powerful laser blasts could be used for locusts. In regions afflicted by malaria, the lasers could be used to create protective fences around clinics, homes, or even agricultural fields as a substitute for pesticides.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,365
17,928
126
flashback of Last Star Fighter. Or was it Star Wars? who had the auto laser cannons?
 
Last edited:

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Cool use of technology. However, I fully expect PETA to be on this guy's tail for cruel and unusual punishment to these poor blood sucking mosquitoes.
 

keird

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2002
3,714
9
81
It is quite safe from your pitiful little band. An entire legion of my best troops awaits them. Oh, I'm afraid the deflector shield will be quite operational when your friends arrive.

I'm glad that they went with the green laser.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
flashback of Last Star Fighter. Or was it Star Wars? who had the auto laser cannons?

gunstar.jpg



HOLY CRAP THEY"RE MAKING SEQUEL!
 
Last edited:

AFurryReptile

Golden Member
Nov 5, 2006
1,998
1
76
Cool use of technology. However, I fully expect PETA to be on this guy's tail for cruel and unusual punishment to these poor blood sucking mosquitoes.

Cruel and unusual punishment? They die in 1/10th of a second! You're right though, peta will still complain...
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
Mosquitoes. The bane of my (outdoor) existence!

Now if some commercially funded "researchers" can do this for mosquitoes, why the hell hasn't it be scaled up for, say, terrorists?
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Mosquitoes. The bane of my (outdoor) existence!

Now if some commercially funded "researchers" can do this for mosquitoes, why the hell hasn't it be scaled up for, say, terrorists?

Heh. I was preparing a crack of that sort.

But currently I'd say there isn't a way to identify mental intentions with any sort of automated targeting system.

This will, however definitely be scaled up in the future for large line defenses.
I imagine a good way of going about that route, no matter what the type of target it was specifically looking for, it would not target any objects bearing what in my mind would be like an RFID.

Would be useful for border defenses, have the system designed to lock onto any viable targets lacking identification. Of course, leave gaps for controlled entry and exit, of which have humans performing security at this points. Forces all traffic, regardless of type, into completely controlled avenues of approach.

This could be airborne defense as well, and, my favorite dream, perimeter shields in space. :)

As for terrorists, I think it's just plain impossible. I reckon you may have been joking, but for the sake of the topic I'll explain why I say that.
Humans have no differentiating physical features that remote targeting systems could identify. What if in a certain area there are not only large numbers of terrorists hiding, but also civilians who live there? All look the same to a computer.
The next logical idea is to see if weapons, munitions, or explosives could be identified on persons. Problem there too: people all over the middle east legally have weapons, it's their culture.

What I find a logical progression to this technology would also incorporate the chemical laser that has been in development for awhile that has the capability to take out just about any vehicle. Not sure how much the latency would be, or at least how long the laser has to be on target to destroy something like a tank or an incoming rocket, and how many shots it could fire in a few seconds. But think of this kind of system on naval vessels! The Interceptor system is the same concept but uses physical weapons to destroy incoming missiles and bombs, rather than laser. Laser would likely be far cheaper if the system had to be put to heavy use over time.

And in general, would be a great portable defense network. I imagine them packing it up, towing it like a towed howitzer, and serving as a mobile rocket shield for a unit on the move.

Most of the war uses for which this technology would serve useful, would basically be all out State-on-State war, not urban/guerrilla warfare.

Most of all, dammit I want my Advanced RFID Token ident system for permitted transit around space battle stations! Would be so damn cool.
:D
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
heh, thought americans were arrogant but look at his shirt:p

very neat, but it looks more like a bug solution to protect rich people in reality.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,073
3,576
126
so when do these come in a female version like this?

soranootoshimono.jpg
 

DanTMWTMP

Lifer
Oct 7, 2001
15,908
19
81
Man, I really want to see that video. Marked until when I get back home with faster internet in end of April. Satellite internet at sea is extremely slow internets :(