LaRouche Says Charges Against Cheney Constitute Grounds For IMPEACHEMENT

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
The gig is up for Cheney. As any reader of the EIR knew last year, all the signifigant intellegence on Iraq which was presented to take this nation to an Imperial 'Preventive' (note: not 'Pre-emptive as Sen. Ted Kennedy proved) war of aggression against a sovergn nation, WAS A FRAUD, AND CHENEY KNEW IT WAS A FRAUD OVER A YEAR BEFORE HE ANNOUNCED IT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, CONGRESS AND SENATE, PRESIDENT, AND THE UNITED NATIONS. The so called 'Yellow Cake' uranium story was completely proven by the intellegence community to be a fraud, and a forged document. Ari Fleicher admitted this in the June 9th, 2003 'White House Press Briefing' as well. Cheney knew it was a lie, but still presented as a reason to immediatly attack Iraq who posed a threat to our security with their "Weapons of Mass Distraction". It is time to kick Cheney out. With Dick Cheney out, the entire chickenhawk apparatus will fall, and the only presidental candidate who DIDN'T lie to you about the economy, the war, and a solution, Lyndon LaRouche, will be your next president. No more "Dirty Dick" and Bush in 2004! Joe Lieberman will guarantee a Bush victory, and the future of our nation depends on impeaching the puppet master "Dirty Dick"



http://larouchein2004.net/pages/pressreleases/2003/030607cheney.htm


 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Read some quotes by Larouche.

Cuckoo

Also remember this is a man who served five years of a fifteen year sentence after being convicted of fraud.
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Read some quotes by Larouche.

Cuckoo

Also remember this is a man who served five years of a fifteen year sentence after being convicted of fraud.

Wrong, LaRouche was never convicted for fraud. He was convicted for the intent to commit fraud in the future. The government put him through a illegal and INVOLUNTARY GOVENRMENT FORCED bankruptcy, then they said since he went bankrupt, he never wanted to pay back his loans, since he went bankrupt. This is circular Aristotelian logic, no one who could think would take this seroiusly, which is why the 3rd illegal case which they finally arrested him on was forced that "Government Corruption" cannot be used in his defence.


Also, show me a FULL LaRouche article for once. You guys who repeat a cut/paste slander job never bother to actually do any real research. I have EVERY LaRouche paper from the 1968-1980 on my website, www.theacademy2004.com under the 'text archive', and all his recent writings are on www.larouchepub.com and larouchein2004.com. Show me just 1 full article which you want to call him crazy on, and we'll talk. if he's as crazy as you say, and all his writings are available to the sites I've posted, then you should have no problem making your case.



And instead of thread dumping on every single post I make, why don't you make a thread dedicated to slandering LaRouche, if that is your forte. I would like to keep my posts on impeaching Dick Cheney and so fourth on focus.
 

tnitsuj

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
5,446
0
76
Isn't Larouche the one who wanted to build a land bridge to Asia?

Thier were always these annoying Larouche people handing out flyers in college. I usually just wanted to hit them.

Please stop posting.
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Isn't Larouche the one who wanted to build a land bridge to Asia?

Thier were always these annoying Larouche people handing out flyers in college. I usually just wanted to hit them.

Please stop posting.

It is a land bridge from the tip of latin america, to the tip of africa thorugh europe, the middle east, russia, and asia. You wanting to hit someone who is helping stop a perpetual world war based on fraud, and to develop the world from this bankruptcy that it is in. Millions of deaths happen every year for no good reason which can be stopped, and you want to hit them. I think you should get help, it's a bad state of mind to be in.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Isn't Larouche the one who wanted to build a land bridge to Asia?

Thier were always these annoying Larouche people handing out flyers in college. I usually just wanted to hit them.

Please stop posting.

still does
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Originally posted by: shinerburke
This just in.......LaRouche is whack!

Because Dick Cheney was proven to have lied to the Congress, the American People, and President Bush to start a imperial war of agression so his buddies at Halliburton could make tons of money, doesn't make LaRouche a whack. You have a funny logic.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
Originally posted by: shinerburke
This just in.......LaRouche is whack!

Because Dick Cheney was proven to have lied to the Congress, the American People, and President Bush to start a imperial war of agression so his buddies at Halliburton could make tons of money, doesn't make LaRouche a whack. You have a funny logic.
No, there are lots of reasons Lyndon is a nutjob. As for your/his other allegations...they have not been proven and are only fact in the minds of conspiracy theorist/Bush haters.

 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
Originally posted by: shinerburke
This just in.......LaRouche is whack!

Because Dick Cheney was proven to have lied to the Congress, the American People, and President Bush to start a imperial war of agression so his buddies at Halliburton could make tons of money, doesn't make LaRouche a whack. You have a funny logic.
No, there are lots of reasons Lyndon is a nutjob. As for your/his other allegations...they have not been proven and are only fact in the minds of conspiracy theorist/Bush haters.

Actually according to Ari Fleicher, you are wrong.


June 9th, 2003 White House Press Release:

Transcript and audio/video of Ari Fleicher/EIR question/Answer on Fale Intellegence available on www.whitehouse.gov on the June 9th Briefing.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/06/20030609-6.html

EIR Q: Q Ari, one of the most vocal of the administration officials in emphasizing unambiguously that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was the Vice President. And, particularly, he was putting forward this -- what was later seen to be forged evidence about the letter indicating purchase of yellow cake from Niger. Can you tell me, at what point did the Vice President know that this evidence or suspected that this evidence was forged in this process?

MR. FLEISCHER: I haven't talked specifically to the Vice President about it, so I can't answer specifically, from his point of view. What I can tell you is, is the American intelligence community, as the information was received about the forgeries behind this, very frankly, spoke up and said that this information was incorrect.

EIR Q: Can you tell me also, Ari, what role the Office of the Vice President or people from the Vice President's office -- like Mr. Libby or others -- played in putting together the package which was presented to the United Nations, trying to justify the attack on Iraq?

MR. FLEISCHER: Again, you need to talk to them specifically about what role they played. But as has been discussed on numerous occasions, the Vice President, whether it be the Secretary of Defense or as Vice President, it is in his capacity, and we are a better administration for it, works carefully with the intelligence community, works carefully with all the agencies involved in the defense of our country to work with them to make certain that we are all working together, we're doing our best to implement the policies of this President.




Want a chronology?
* Sometime in late 2001, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency received a series of documents on the letterhead of the Niger government, detailing repeated attempts by Iraq to purchase vast quantities of uranium oxide ?yellow cake,? a precursor for nuclear weapons.

* In early 2002, Vice President Cheney requested that the documents be investigated and, as a result, a former U.S. Ambassador to African countries was dispatched to Niger.

* Sometime in February 2002, officials of the CIA, the State Department and the Vice President were informed by the ex-Ambassador that the documents were forgeries. The fact that the documents were forgeries was reported around the Bush Administration.

* Nevertheless, on Sept. 24, 2002, Bush Administration officials and CIA officials briefed Congressional leaders that the Iraqis were attempting to purchase ?yellow cake? from an African country. The same day, the Office of British Prime Minister Tony Blair published a dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, foisting the same false information about the Niger uranium purchases.

* On Dec. 19, 2002, the U.S. State Department published a one-page fact sheet, disputing Iraq's weapons declarations to the United Nations Security Council, again citing the Niger sales of ?yellow cake? to Iraq.

* During January 2003, every top national security official of the Bush Administration, including National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and President Bush, himself, cited Iraq's efforts to obtain nuclear materials from Africa, in briefings, interviews and, in the case of George Bush, in his State of the Union address.

* On March 7, 2003, Dr. Mohammed ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) delivered testimony before the United Nations Security Council, in which he exposed the Niger documents as shoddy frauds.

* Even following the ElBaradei public revelations, Vice President Dick Cheney, appearing on March 16 on ?Meet the Press,? repeated the Iraq nuclear material lie.

The next day, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Cal.) wrote his first letter to President Bush, demanding an accounting of the repetition of proven fabrications.



THE REP. HENRY WAXMAN LETTER: Rep. Waxman To Pres. Bush: ?Explain Why You Cited Forged Evidence'

THE REP. HENRY WAXMAN LETTER: The Bush Administration Reply
 

Michael

Elite member
Nov 19, 1999
5,435
234
106
Don't reply to KAMAZON. He shows up every once and a while and spouts garbage. Just about anyone with a sane braincell thinks that LaRouche is a whack job and replying to him just bumps his threads and gives him an excuse to post more garbage.

Michael
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Originally posted by: burnedout
Originally posted by: shinerburke
This just in.......LaRouche is whack!
ditto

I challenge you to find ANY article, video, or webcast of LaRouche to back your claim. I have all of his writings from 1968-1980s on my site, TheAcademy2004, under the 'text archive' section. You can get all of his new speeches off that site under the "Lyndon LaRouche" section. You can get all of his other writings from www.larouchein2004.com or www.larouchepub.com. Get me an actual article, not some cut/paste sentance. Show me why he's what you claim by an actual backed article that you've read, or heard from our publications or LaRouche.
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Originally posted by: Michael
Don't reply to KAMAZON. He shows up every once and a while and spouts garbage. Just about anyone with a sane braincell thinks that LaRouche is a whack job and replying to him just bumps his threads and gives him an excuse to post more garbage.

Michael

are you telling me that "Dirty Dick" Cheneys fraud in getting an imperial war against a sovergn nation 'garbage'? Do you value liberty and the founding principles of the USA to actually back your claim, when it is proven he knew what he was saying was fraud? You not bohtering to investigate treason is what I call "Garbage". People like you who do nothing during a national crisis are defined as "Garbage" by the founding fathers and true patriots.


Also, are you telling me then, all the people who are working with or support LaRouche right now to implement a new global financial system since this one is bankrupt (Like only LaRouche warned) are 'people with a half cell brain'? You must think you're something special. Here is just a short list of people demanding he be included in the debates. Do you feel stupid now?

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1069111
""LaRouche Must Be Included in the Upcoming Debate"
Text of the letter
SIGNATURES:

Assemblyman Mervyn Dymally, former Chairman, Congressional Black Caucus, Los Angeles, CA

Hon. Joycelyn Elders, former Surgeon-General of U.S., Little Rock, AR

Senator Eugene McCarthy, former U.S. Senator, and former candidate for President, MN

Senator Joseph Neal, Chair, Nevada Legislative Black Caucus, 2002 Democratic Nominee for Governor of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV

Amelia Boynton Robinson, Vice-President, Schiller Institute, Recipient, Martin Luther King, Jr. Foundation Medal of Freedom, Tuskegee Institute, AL

JL Chestnut, Esq., Author, "Black in Selma," Selma, AL

J.E. "Billy" McKinney, former member, GA House of Representatives, Atlanta, GA

Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad, National Spokesman, Nation of Islam, Washington, D.C.

Rep. Earle Banks, MS House of Representatives, Jackson, MS

Rep. Erik Fleming, MS House of Representatives, Jackson, MS

Rep. Alexander Lipsey, Michigan House of Representatives, Kalamazoo, MI

Senator Alma Wheeler Smith, former member, MI State Senate, S. Lyon, MI

Rep. James Thomas, Alabama House of Representatives, former president, National Black Caucus of State Legislators, Selma, AL

Barbara Lett Simmons, Democratic National Committeewoman, Washington, D.C.

Mary Rasmussen, Democratic National Committeewoman, Boyceville, Wisconsin

Rep. Harold James, PA House of Representatives, former Chair, Pennsylvania Legislative Black Caucus, Philadelphia, PA

Rep. Howard Kenner, former member, Illinois State Legislature, Chicago, IL

Senator L. Louise Lucas, Virginia State Senate, Portsmouth, VA

Senator Maggie Wallace Glover, South Carolina Senate, Florence, SC

Senator Daryl Jones, former President, Florida State Senate, Miami, FL

Senator Henry "Hank" Wilkins IV, Chairman, Arkansas Legislative Black Caucus, Pine Bluff, Arkansas

Rep. Demetrius Newton, Speaker Pro Tem, Alabama House of Representatives, Birmingham, AL

Senator Charles Steele, Chair, AL Senate Legislative Black Caucus, State President, Alabama Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Tuscaloosa, AL

Rep. Thomas Jackson, Vice-Chair, Democratic Caucus, Alabama State House; Chairman, Agriculture Committee, NBCSL, Thomasville, AL
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: tcsenter
I have EVERY LaRouche paper from the 1968-1980 on my website, www.theacademy2004.com under the 'text archive', and all his recent writings are on www.larouchepub.com and larouchein2004.com.
You know, for some reason, I really believe you. And just thinking about it makes me want my Mommy. Make the bad man go away!

Gee I have most everything on the Kennedy fiasco... wonder what that makes me? Guess if you believe something hard enough you only see that part that fits your preconceived notion of reality.
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
50
91
"With Dick Cheney out, the entire chickenhawk apparatus will fall, and the only presidental candidate who DIDN'T lie to you about the economy, the war, and a solution, Lyndon LaRouche, will be your next president. "

Convicted felons aren't allowed to run for office. Sorry Charlie.
 

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,953
576
126
Gee I have most everything on the Kennedy fiasco... wonder what that makes me? Guess if you believe something hard enough you only see that part that fits your preconceived notion of reality.
lol! That cuts both ways, like having a veritable shrine of every word ever written by a fruit like Larouche or having your own personal Warren Commission on the Kennedy Assassination. Or by Kennedy fiasco did you mean the Skakel/Moxley thing? That would be even weirder than weird.

Though, having an almost zealous interest in a major historical event is a bit different than having an almost zealous interest in the ramblings of a lunatic.
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Originally posted by: X-Man
"With Dick Cheney out, the entire chickenhawk apparatus will fall, and the only presidental candidate who DIDN'T lie to you about the economy, the war, and a solution, Lyndon LaRouche, will be your next president. "

Convicted felons aren't allowed to run for office. Sorry Charlie.



Actually Convected felons aren't allowed to vote, they are allowed to run. If Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were here, he would tell you too.
 

AAman

Golden Member
May 29, 2001
1,432
0
0
the Great Lyndon Larouche Frog Massacre! Yeah, what fun! Let's go Bill,
don't forget the grenades, rocket launchers, and spare clips for the AK!
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Originally posted by: AAman
the Great Lyndon Larouche Frog Massacre! Yeah, what fun! Let's go Bill,
don't forget the grenades, rocket launchers, and spare clips for the AK!

Actually the largest government raid was against LaRouches house, since they said 'he had weapons' (not Weapons of Mass Distruction, tho both were equally liable sources). They sent over 400 agents, snipers, SWAT members, helicopters, ATF agents, FBI, Sherrif dept., ARGUS (Street tanks), and fixed wing aircrafts. Later it was proven they knew he didn't have weapons. All this was televised by NBC too.
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Gee I have most everything on the Kennedy fiasco... wonder what that makes me? Guess if you believe something hard enough you only see that part that fits your preconceived notion of reality.
lol! That cuts both ways, like having a veritable shrine of every word ever written by a fruit like Larouche or having your own personal Warren Commission on the Kennedy Assassination. Or by Kennedy fiasco did you mean the Skakel/Moxley thing? That would be even weirder than weird.

Though, having an almost zealous interest in a major historical event is a bit different than having an almost zealous interest in the ramblings of a lunatic.


Skakle did it...:) Mark Furman said so... He ain't no Henry Lee but, he's good.

No it be JFK that interests me. I am an acquaintance to the Groton fellow and talked with a fellow at Bethesda who was there at the time... that's what got me going.. Ya. know they are still looking for his brain... The single most important piece of forensic evidence is missing.... if you wish to believe missing.

edit: Forgot about LaRouch... in his ramblings are bits and pieces worth considering.. not much but, enough to tweek the interest... he clouds it with so much BS that rational people never get to the second paragraph.. bits and pieces...
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
Originally posted by: X-Man
"With Dick Cheney out, the entire chickenhawk apparatus will fall, and the only presidental candidate who DIDN'T lie to you about the economy, the war, and a solution, Lyndon LaRouche, will be your next president. "

Convicted felons aren't allowed to run for office. Sorry Charlie.



Actually Convected felons aren't allowed to vote, they are allowed to run. If Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were here, he would tell you too.


Not true for all states... One can have civil rights restored either by appeal or by procedure in place after time. Florida has such a statute... California as well, I believe.
 

Bleep

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,972
0
0
LaRouche is just another radical that has always seen a conspiricy around every corner. He is fun to listen to and a good speaker but really has a skewed idea of what it means to be a American.

Bleep