- May 16, 2008
- 3,180
- 0
- 0
Has anyone followed the latest mobile processors closely enough to fairly accurately compare them?
For example ultrabooks i7's with ~1.7Ghz and whatever the wattage seem like they must be somewhat neutered compared to e.g. i7 3830ms at ~2.4-3.3GHz or are they mainly just downclocked. Then compared to ~4770k/3770k.
Someone had been complaining about performance on an expensive ultrabook but without even knowing the true performance I'd guess its at least half as fast due to the clock speed alone but it'd be interesting to know a little more accurately the performance across these three lines (desktop, mobile, ulv i7's).
The gtx 680m comes to mind as its equal to the gtx 660 desktop part (or was it 660 ti) so it makes an easy reference.
Is it possible to say an i7 3770/4770 at e.g. 0.7GHz == 1.7ghz ulv etc. (In general) those numbers are of course made up.
For example ultrabooks i7's with ~1.7Ghz and whatever the wattage seem like they must be somewhat neutered compared to e.g. i7 3830ms at ~2.4-3.3GHz or are they mainly just downclocked. Then compared to ~4770k/3770k.
Someone had been complaining about performance on an expensive ultrabook but without even knowing the true performance I'd guess its at least half as fast due to the clock speed alone but it'd be interesting to know a little more accurately the performance across these three lines (desktop, mobile, ulv i7's).
The gtx 680m comes to mind as its equal to the gtx 660 desktop part (or was it 660 ti) so it makes an easy reference.
Is it possible to say an i7 3770/4770 at e.g. 0.7GHz == 1.7ghz ulv etc. (In general) those numbers are of course made up.
