Originally posted by: knouri
My wifes Emachines laptop that uses a Barton 2400+ gets over 3.5 hours on it's battery which is much better than the P4 DTR laptops which usually clock in at 1.5-2.5 hours as I've seen. It's got a 15.4" widescreen display too.
Originally posted by: SithSolo1
Great, now somebody replies after the purchase has been made...
Is the difference enough to warrant taking it back and spenting about $200 more?
Originally posted by: magomago
My friend just got a 1.6 Centrino from IBM and yeah its 7 hours, but that is 7 hours on standby 😉 When he uses it it goes to about 3 hours of battery life which still rocks
Originally posted by: busmaster11
On its own merits, I'd easily go for a Barton mobile over a P4m. But the AMD's usually come with much crappier hardware, namely chipset and graphics... Makes them look bad...
Originally posted by: Ionizer86
Originally posted by: busmaster11
On its own merits, I'd easily go for a Barton mobile over a P4m. But the AMD's usually come with much crappier hardware, namely chipset and graphics... Makes them look bad...
Well, HP's come with the ATi IGP 320M chipset, which is pretty decent. They support DDR, they have a Radeon 7000 chipset, etc. It won't be the best at gaming, but for 2D, it suffices.
I remembered looking at a Physics teacher's P-M Centrino laptop (Dell 600M). The estimated battery life was very poor: 1.5 hours when it was at 90% full!